<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: The Last of Us PS4 vs PS3 GIF Comparison: PS3 Holds Up Well Against Its Successor	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gamingbolt.com/the-last-of-us-ps4-vs-ps3-gif-comparison-ps3-holds-up-well-against-its-successor/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gamingbolt.com/the-last-of-us-ps4-vs-ps3-gif-comparison-ps3-holds-up-well-against-its-successor</link>
	<description>Get a Bolt of Gaming Now!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2014 22:29:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Georges		</title>
		<link>https://gamingbolt.com/the-last-of-us-ps4-vs-ps3-gif-comparison-ps3-holds-up-well-against-its-successor#comment-238380</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Georges]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2014 22:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamingbolt.com/?p=203974#comment-238380</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://gamingbolt.com/the-last-of-us-ps4-vs-ps3-gif-comparison-ps3-holds-up-well-against-its-successor#comment-238373&quot;&gt;Mark&lt;/a&gt;.

a few last things, if people think its too soon nothing prevents them from waiting a year then they can buy it for very cheap (which many will do including me waiting for a few months) so that s a very good thing for them and not a &#039;cash grab&#039; focus from DN 2 as for &#039;cash grab&#039; label Im sure they could sell this game £50 instead of £30 that you can find in UK and many will buy it so this is actually a very good offer for people who never played it with all dlc included and yea 60fps is the big deal in this remaster]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://gamingbolt.com/the-last-of-us-ps4-vs-ps3-gif-comparison-ps3-holds-up-well-against-its-successor#comment-238373">Mark</a>.</p>
<p>a few last things, if people think its too soon nothing prevents them from waiting a year then they can buy it for very cheap (which many will do including me waiting for a few months) so that s a very good thing for them and not a &#8216;cash grab&#8217; focus from DN 2 as for &#8216;cash grab&#8217; label Im sure they could sell this game £50 instead of £30 that you can find in UK and many will buy it so this is actually a very good offer for people who never played it with all dlc included and yea 60fps is the big deal in this remaster</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mark		</title>
		<link>https://gamingbolt.com/the-last-of-us-ps4-vs-ps3-gif-comparison-ps3-holds-up-well-against-its-successor#comment-238373</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2014 15:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamingbolt.com/?p=203974#comment-238373</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://gamingbolt.com/the-last-of-us-ps4-vs-ps3-gif-comparison-ps3-holds-up-well-against-its-successor#comment-238369&quot;&gt;Georges&lt;/a&gt;.

Here&#039;s my opinion. If there&#039;s a ton of last gen remasters for current gen, that&#039;s great if u wanna go back n have some fun from old games, with an upgraded punch. It isn&#039;t like TLOU remaster&#039;s holding back UC4. 

On a different side of the token, I think any game that re-releases within 1 1/2 years, and has only a minor visual upgrade, is in danger of being seen as a &quot;cash grab&quot;. The fact that it resembles the PS3 version (obviously with the remaster lookin more crisp) doesn&#039;t help to make it an immediate &quot;remaster&quot; to many people imo. I think that&#039;s the biggest factor to people. I think the 60fps couldn&#039;t sell the game like a huge visual jump. And the DLC is a nice bonus, but not a &quot;selling point&quot; to most people imo. 

U know, I think Sony shoulda let TLOU get old for 2 years, then BOOM, a remaster edition to give gamers that great nostalgia back. I think they shoulda made people miss it. Otherwise I think gamers feel beat over the head with it, releasing too soon, and becoming a perceived &quot;cash grab&quot;. It&#039;s all perception though. But a smart person will make u miss something, and then it&#039;ll become &quot;Darn I loved that game&quot;. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://gamingbolt.com/the-last-of-us-ps4-vs-ps3-gif-comparison-ps3-holds-up-well-against-its-successor#comment-238369">Georges</a>.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s my opinion. If there&#8217;s a ton of last gen remasters for current gen, that&#8217;s great if u wanna go back n have some fun from old games, with an upgraded punch. It isn&#8217;t like TLOU remaster&#8217;s holding back UC4. </p>
<p>On a different side of the token, I think any game that re-releases within 1 1/2 years, and has only a minor visual upgrade, is in danger of being seen as a &#8220;cash grab&#8221;. The fact that it resembles the PS3 version (obviously with the remaster lookin more crisp) doesn&#8217;t help to make it an immediate &#8220;remaster&#8221; to many people imo. I think that&#8217;s the biggest factor to people. I think the 60fps couldn&#8217;t sell the game like a huge visual jump. And the DLC is a nice bonus, but not a &#8220;selling point&#8221; to most people imo. </p>
<p>U know, I think Sony shoulda let TLOU get old for 2 years, then BOOM, a remaster edition to give gamers that great nostalgia back. I think they shoulda made people miss it. Otherwise I think gamers feel beat over the head with it, releasing too soon, and becoming a perceived &#8220;cash grab&#8221;. It&#8217;s all perception though. But a smart person will make u miss something, and then it&#8217;ll become &#8220;Darn I loved that game&#8221;. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Georges		</title>
		<link>https://gamingbolt.com/the-last-of-us-ps4-vs-ps3-gif-comparison-ps3-holds-up-well-against-its-successor#comment-238369</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Georges]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2014 13:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamingbolt.com/?p=203974#comment-238369</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://gamingbolt.com/the-last-of-us-ps4-vs-ps3-gif-comparison-ps3-holds-up-well-against-its-successor#comment-238357&quot;&gt;Mark&lt;/a&gt;.

No worries I know what they are trying to say ;) (they already said this remastered is just a cash grab in their opinion)
Its always nice to have a remastered version that you can play later with renewed interest  whether you buy it day one or later on for cheaper. 
Im done with this trolling site]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://gamingbolt.com/the-last-of-us-ps4-vs-ps3-gif-comparison-ps3-holds-up-well-against-its-successor#comment-238357">Mark</a>.</p>
<p>No worries I know what they are trying to say 😉 (they already said this remastered is just a cash grab in their opinion)<br />
Its always nice to have a remastered version that you can play later with renewed interest  whether you buy it day one or later on for cheaper.<br />
Im done with this trolling site</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mark		</title>
		<link>https://gamingbolt.com/the-last-of-us-ps4-vs-ps3-gif-comparison-ps3-holds-up-well-against-its-successor#comment-238357</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2014 12:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamingbolt.com/?p=203974#comment-238357</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://gamingbolt.com/the-last-of-us-ps4-vs-ps3-gif-comparison-ps3-holds-up-well-against-its-successor#comment-238333&quot;&gt;Georges&lt;/a&gt;.

I think they&#039;re trying to say those specs may not be enough to upgrade, for existing PS3 owners. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://gamingbolt.com/the-last-of-us-ps4-vs-ps3-gif-comparison-ps3-holds-up-well-against-its-successor#comment-238333">Georges</a>.</p>
<p>I think they&#8217;re trying to say those specs may not be enough to upgrade, for existing PS3 owners. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Georges		</title>
		<link>https://gamingbolt.com/the-last-of-us-ps4-vs-ps3-gif-comparison-ps3-holds-up-well-against-its-successor#comment-238333</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Georges]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2014 23:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamingbolt.com/?p=203974#comment-238333</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&#039;look amazing but for some existing owners there may be no reason for an upgrade&#039; Gaminbot just letting you know PS4 version is 60fps so that s another reason, +its 1080p on a large TV screen]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;look amazing but for some existing owners there may be no reason for an upgrade&#8217; Gaminbot just letting you know PS4 version is 60fps so that s another reason, +its 1080p on a large TV screen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Guest		</title>
		<link>https://gamingbolt.com/the-last-of-us-ps4-vs-ps3-gif-comparison-ps3-holds-up-well-against-its-successor#comment-238306</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guest]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2014 16:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamingbolt.com/?p=203974#comment-238306</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Yep, shows that shilling out another $40+ is stupid.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, shows that shilling out another $40+ is stupid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
