Comments on: The Playstation 3 is NOT the First or Only Console That Does 3D Gaming

By: james braselton

james braselton — Thu, 18 Nov 2010 05:50:33 +0000

hi there sony needs sonys 3d glasses for 3d microsoft 3d and jintendo suport 3d no glasses with a 3d no glasses tvs nintendo should make 3d tvs no glasses for a 3d wii 2

By: xot

xot — Fri, 30 Jul 2010 01:11:52 +0000

In reply to Pramath. Meanwhile, I said "stereographic" instead of "stereoscopic". :P It's all to easy to get these technical terms mixed up.

By: Richard Nelson

Richard Nelson — Wed, 28 Jul 2010 13:15:32 +0000

The PS3’s 3D isnt stereoscopic though.. tons of consoles have been able to support stereoscopic….. douche.

By: Shendow

Shendow — Tue, 27 Jul 2010 18:26:44 +0000

No I wouldn’t, just because one game is 3D doesn’t mean the system fully does 3D, keep in mind what you are lacking to understand is that everything on the PS3 can be 3D because it is on the system and your movies can to.

By: americanPie

americanPie — Tue, 27 Jul 2010 15:32:21 +0000

25 you hit the nail on the head. Pramath your a weak journalist…wait let me refrace…you are a 100% Xbot with no life,stop writing, nobody believes you exept other Xbots, you are an idiot…move over, let real journalist do the writing.

By: moparful99

moparful99 — Tue, 27 Jul 2010 07:47:36 +0000

Wow damage control much? Nobody, from my interaction on the internet, has proclaimed that sony is pioneering 3d.. They are simply stating that sony is the first to really “push” the tech. There’s a difference and its important you can differentiate them. It’s just like the wii, they in no way by any means pioneered motion controls but they are the first to push the technology so hard and they were successful because of that.. This whole sony bashing phenomenon needs to stop, despite their ferverent attempts at pleasing everybody they continue to be spit in the face by the media, yourself included. Slow your role for a second and think about things before posting this rubbish online please.. You are only succeeding in segregating your audience and diminishing the value of your opinions..

By: Pramath

Pramath — Tue, 27 Jul 2010 06:58:39 +0000

In reply to shendow. If a NES game was 3D, then I'd say that the NES was 3D compatible, wouldn't you? Otherwise, how was the game 3D in the first place?

By: shendow

shendow — Tue, 27 Jul 2010 04:22:16 +0000

doesn’t change the fact ps is the first console to do 3d, if you can read it says “console” an not game, so doesn’t change the fact that you are wrong.

An you seem to forget the batman aa goty is in 3d to.

By: Mike

Mike — Tue, 27 Jul 2010 03:50:24 +0000

In reply to Mike.

Continued…

The comparison being, of course, that 3D will fail to become a standard if you aren’t forced to use it.

By: Mike

Mike — Tue, 27 Jul 2010 03:47:06 +0000

Like others have said, the sega master system used stereoscopic LCD shutter glasses in the 1980s. It came packaged with the system when I bought it. Missle Defense 3D, zaxxon 3d, space harrier 3d, maze hunter 3d, were just a few of the 3d games.

But of course, the technology has been around for much longer and they’ve had it for the pc for a long time, it just never really caught on as a standard. Its the same thing with motion controls; the technology has been around a long time, it just never got popular until now. Nintendo made analog sticks and motion controls standard by forcing you to use them with their consoles and in their games. The wii’s motion controllers are truly terrible and jittery, but you don’t have any other choice. Kinect and Move wont be as popular because you aren’t forced to use them. This gives little incentive to developers.