Comments on: The Witcher 3: When Visual Compromise is a Good Thing

By: Lars Anderson

Lars Anderson — Sun, 22 Mar 2015 21:06:00 +0000

It does look worse than it did a year ago. Maybe because it’s WIP it’ll be back to that standard at launch, but you can’t blame people for claiming it has been nerfed, especially since CDP went multiplatform which is usually the kiss of death for CRPGs.

By: GotNews4Ya

GotNews4Ya — Fri, 20 Mar 2015 07:03:00 +0000

In reply to d0x360. Agreed! I think it looks amazing for a cross platform game! and the story is Second to NONE, who cares how beautiful it is.. at one point or another visuals will reach a max... stories cannot

By: AmazingItsNotOverYet

AmazingItsNotOverYet — Fri, 20 Mar 2015 01:34:00 +0000

Don’t leave out Dark Souls 2 when talking about visual downgrades from promised footage.

By: spideynut71

spideynut71 — Thu, 19 Mar 2015 17:32:00 +0000

Let’s get one thing straight: visual compromise is NEVER a “good thing”. It may be a NECESSARY thing, but that doesn’t make it good.

By: d0x360

d0x360 — Thu, 19 Mar 2015 16:44:00 +0000

I hate people whining about downgrades. When you make a game you have to GUESS what hardware will be 4 years into the future. So yes sometimes a game won’t look as good as they unveil but blame hardware not devs.

Witcher 3/ looks incredible so who cares!? It looks way better than watch dogs ever could have dreamed. I’ll be playing on PC with visuals craaaaaaanked way up. Gonna be incredible.

By: Nintendo Fan 4 Lif3

Nintendo Fan 4 Lif3 — Thu, 19 Mar 2015 15:14:00 +0000

In reply to Psionicinversion.

http://www.dsogaming.com/news/the-witcher-3-runs-with-60fps-at-ultra-settings-on-intel-i7-4790-with-gtx980-gets-new-screenshot/ and http://www.gamespot.com/articles/witcher-3-4k-image-is-totally-gorgeous/1100-6426002/

By: Psionicinversion

Psionicinversion — Thu, 19 Mar 2015 14:33:00 +0000

Just by putting your game on consoles means your compromising on visual quality so nothing you can do