Comments on: Ubisoft Discovers That PS4 GPU Is Twice As Powerful As Xbox One GPU

By: Byron Injeeli

Byron Injeeli — Wed, 18 Mar 2015 04:59:00 +0000

More evidence why the PS4 trumps the XBox 1.

By: Shaun Phillips

Shaun Phillips — Thu, 12 Mar 2015 00:01:00 +0000

Lets not forget that the XBO cpu is over clocked.

By: medafor

medafor — Sun, 19 Oct 2014 03:58:00 +0000

Xbox One has twice as many and better exclusive titles available that’s all that matter to the non techie.

By: Michal

Michal — Sat, 18 Oct 2014 19:09:00 +0000

That last sentence X_X
One word: f*** off.
Now let’s have fun with GAMES.

By: MrSec84 .

MrSec84 . — Sat, 18 Oct 2014 17:30:00 +0000

In reply to Charles – The Great and Powerf.

LMFAO dude it’s 32MBs of eSRAM, with a maximum real world speed of 150GB/s, that’s no match for 8192MBs of GDDR5 at 172GB/s real world useable speed.
It also doesn’t help the 8GBs of DDR3 when that’s clocked at 55GB/s and can only read or write in a cycle, GDDR5 can do both simultaneously and it’s over 3X the speed, latency is also comparable between the two.
The level of contention between CPU and GPU for DDR3 is much greater than PS4’s set-up.

Xbox One doesn’t touch PS4 for performance, this is what these benchmarks show, the GPU can perform 100% better than Xbox One, because of the faster memory, more raw power and the far more efficient design using 4X the ACEs.

PS4 is the system that’s superior in every way that matters, even the TrueAudio chip in PS4 is more capable than shape is in Xbox One.

You can’t even really say the Xbox One really has dedicated graphics RAM, GDDR5 was designed for that, but the level of latency is comparable to DDR3 in Xbox One, so it really doesn’t matter.

By: Psionicinversion

Psionicinversion — Fri, 17 Oct 2014 23:45:00 +0000

In reply to Charles – The Great and Powerf.

lmao neither console has dedicated graphics ram. OMG are people stupid these days. Unified memory means everything gets stored in there, theres no system ram + VRAM its combined together so PS4 has 5GB available to devs includes the main game process textures audio everuthing, same as X1. and no the x1 is not superior the CPU is becuase it can do parallel processing but the GPU side no way. no chance its simple logic.

If crackdown successfully offloads all the heavy stuff to “the cloud” it may have a chance BUT what if the internet is down, in UK it can shut off then have to restart modem, think they only way it may avoid it is to have a static IP but you pay more otherwise its dynamic

By: Charles - The Great and Powerf

Charles - The Great and Powerf — Fri, 17 Oct 2014 20:18:00 +0000

Just gonna say this once. XBox One = dedicated graphics RAM, PS4 = no dedicated graphics RAM. The reason they are using the GPU for CPU is that they use the same RAM so there’s little distinction. XBOX ONE is far superior to the PS4 in every way imaginable. Done.

By: MrSec84 .

MrSec84 . — Fri, 17 Oct 2014 17:38:00 +0000

In reply to Mark.

eSRAM is embedded, static, RAM, not a processor.
Lionhead were saying that compute data could be stored in eSRAM, not that eSRAM was doing any actual processing.

eSRAM wasn’t processing render targets, it was storing the data for them.

By: MrSec84 .

MrSec84 . — Fri, 17 Oct 2014 17:37:00 +0000

Technically PS4’s GPU has 40% more raw power, but it’s faster, more flexible main memory and additional ACEs make sure less of the GPU time is wasted.
Essentially PS4’s set-up is more efficient, along with more powerful, so that’s where the extra GPU performance is coming from in this benchmark.

By: Psionicinversion

Psionicinversion — Fri, 17 Oct 2014 11:15:00 +0000

In reply to Mark. problem with the consoles is while people will only pay around $400 for them unless they sell them at a loss again they will constantly trail behind PC's by a large margin