Comments on: Valve’s Dan Ginsburg Thinks Vulkan Is Better Alternative To Creating A Back End With DX12 https://gamingbolt.com/valves-dan-ginsburg-thinks-vulkan-is-better-alternative-to-creating-a-back-end-with-dx12 Get a Bolt of Gaming Now! Thu, 24 Sep 2015 10:43:00 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3 By: XbotMK1 https://gamingbolt.com/valves-dan-ginsburg-thinks-vulkan-is-better-alternative-to-creating-a-back-end-with-dx12#comment-271523 Thu, 24 Sep 2015 10:43:00 +0000 http://gamingbolt.com/?p=244050#comment-271523 In reply to Luieburger.

It’s the well known Microsoft fanboys like Mark, GamerJudge, Pazz, and One the One.

]]> By: XbotMK1 https://gamingbolt.com/valves-dan-ginsburg-thinks-vulkan-is-better-alternative-to-creating-a-back-end-with-dx12#comment-271522 Thu, 24 Sep 2015 10:40:00 +0000 http://gamingbolt.com/?p=244050#comment-271522 WOW

So when a developer says that Vulkan is superior to DX12, you call him bias? But when Brad Wardell and Microsoft talk up DX12, you’ve been kissing their @ss?

No sh*t this developer has a bias. He’s telling you that Vulkan is superior to Direct X because Vulkan doesn’t lock you into a specific platform like Direct X does. He is absolutely correct. Fact. There is no hidden bias. Only a Microsoft fanboy would deny this or defend Direct X.

Once again, Gamingbolt has released a sh*t article.

]]> By: Luieburger https://gamingbolt.com/valves-dan-ginsburg-thinks-vulkan-is-better-alternative-to-creating-a-back-end-with-dx12#comment-271499 Thu, 24 Sep 2015 00:15:00 +0000 http://gamingbolt.com/?p=244050#comment-271499 I love watching the DX12 fanbois clamoring here to defend MS. Comedy gold.

]]> By: kee1haul https://gamingbolt.com/valves-dan-ginsburg-thinks-vulkan-is-better-alternative-to-creating-a-back-end-with-dx12#comment-271483 Wed, 23 Sep 2015 21:15:00 +0000 http://gamingbolt.com/?p=244050#comment-271483 Wasnt DX12 already shown to be superior? Mantle is gone, Vulkan is going to be something at some point, but DX12 is already out there.

]]> By: Orion Wolf https://gamingbolt.com/valves-dan-ginsburg-thinks-vulkan-is-better-alternative-to-creating-a-back-end-with-dx12#comment-271478 Wed, 23 Sep 2015 19:59:00 +0000 http://gamingbolt.com/?p=244050#comment-271478 In reply to Mark.

Indeed, I don’t have anything against Vulkan, actually if it’s better than dx12 or whatever … well, by all means than.

If nothing else, it will (hopefully) push MS to invest more into dx12.

]]> By: Mark https://gamingbolt.com/valves-dan-ginsburg-thinks-vulkan-is-better-alternative-to-creating-a-back-end-with-dx12#comment-271468 Wed, 23 Sep 2015 19:06:00 +0000 http://gamingbolt.com/?p=244050#comment-271468 He does have a solid point. But ultimately it’s good that there’s new features and tools for devs within APIs to get more performance back outta hardware. People argue over nothing. Both APIs will be used for games and that’s all we want, A-Sync compute, Conservative Raster, Volume Tiled Resources, being used to build 2016’s games and beyond.

]]> By: Grifter17 https://gamingbolt.com/valves-dan-ginsburg-thinks-vulkan-is-better-alternative-to-creating-a-back-end-with-dx12#comment-271460 Wed, 23 Sep 2015 18:06:00 +0000 http://gamingbolt.com/?p=244050#comment-271460 Of Course Valve is going to say this, but we know DX12 is shipping this year … Valve Hopes Vulcan comes out at some point … down the road …

]]> By: Tyson225 https://gamingbolt.com/valves-dan-ginsburg-thinks-vulkan-is-better-alternative-to-creating-a-back-end-with-dx12#comment-271457 Wed, 23 Sep 2015 17:19:00 +0000 http://gamingbolt.com/?p=244050#comment-271457 Lul i guess i would say anything for money too

]]> By: Pazz https://gamingbolt.com/valves-dan-ginsburg-thinks-vulkan-is-better-alternative-to-creating-a-back-end-with-dx12#comment-271456 Wed, 23 Sep 2015 17:14:00 +0000 http://gamingbolt.com/?p=244050#comment-271456 Ginsburg has been working very closely on Vulkan for Valve and talks about…
…
…
Vulkan is far superior technology

]]>