<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Why &#8220;this&#8221; can sell more than Microsoft Kinect or PlayStation Move	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gamingbolt.com/why-this-can-sell-more-than-microsoft-kinect-or-playstation-move/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gamingbolt.com/why-this-can-sell-more-than-microsoft-kinect-or-playstation-move</link>
	<description>Get a Bolt of Gaming Now!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2018 18:21:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: NamelessTed		</title>
		<link>https://gamingbolt.com/why-this-can-sell-more-than-microsoft-kinect-or-playstation-move#comment-39862</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[NamelessTed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Nov 2010 21:41:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamingbolt.com/?p=13702#comment-39862</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This would never sell more than the Kinect. It just wouldn&#039;t.

I am sure this probably looks really cool to people on the internet that play FPS games but the technology literally has no applications outside of that very specific genre. Even within the FPS world, it would only be neat for a very short while before people would quit using it. The tech isn&#039;t usable in any sort of competitive environment and would just get annoying to hold a controller with a screen attached to it after a while.

Kinect, Move, and Wii all have a much much larger potential audience and the different control methods have a very wide variety of game play possibilities as well as various interface options that this gun completely fails to offer.

You also have to realize that the game gun requires an even larger amount of space to maneuver compared to the Move or Kinect, which is very much an issue.

If you are going to post about how you like this so much and speculate that it would sell more than the Kinect or Move then at least have an inkling of an argument to back you up. Don&#039;t just make a statement and post a video that we all say a year ago.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This would never sell more than the Kinect. It just wouldn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>I am sure this probably looks really cool to people on the internet that play FPS games but the technology literally has no applications outside of that very specific genre. Even within the FPS world, it would only be neat for a very short while before people would quit using it. The tech isn&#8217;t usable in any sort of competitive environment and would just get annoying to hold a controller with a screen attached to it after a while.</p>
<p>Kinect, Move, and Wii all have a much much larger potential audience and the different control methods have a very wide variety of game play possibilities as well as various interface options that this gun completely fails to offer.</p>
<p>You also have to realize that the game gun requires an even larger amount of space to maneuver compared to the Move or Kinect, which is very much an issue.</p>
<p>If you are going to post about how you like this so much and speculate that it would sell more than the Kinect or Move then at least have an inkling of an argument to back you up. Don&#8217;t just make a statement and post a video that we all say a year ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
