We all know that was said simply to drum up attention.

Everybody already knows 3GB or RAm is reserved for the OS, its not fully selectable as he tries to imply.

He is trying to seed doubt in the minds of those who have decided against xbone, they want people to be confused because the truth for xbone is not very nice these days.

Why else have they changed almost every announcement made about the xbone 180 to date? They realize their mistake and are trying every trick in the book to fool people back to thier side, its a desperate attempt but based on many comments here I would say many are falling for it.

Cheers.

I agree it will be the future, but until then it will be a mostly useless peripheral that kids and soccer moms use for dance and workout games.

For hardcore gaming it is no where near accurate or fast enough.
Although the gun smith use was the closest it has come yet, not really a game feature but seemed to work good for the loadout menus. Thats kinects real future, for os interaction, or a tv guide viewer. Then as you say 20-30 yrs down the road it will be in everything and be up to par for games, etc.

I would like to thank all the xbone 180 buyers for struggling through the frustration so one day I can have a functional motion control scheme.

You guys are heroes, I could never put up with that.

I know right, how do they expect to stall a process and take all its memory away? They gonna store it on the hdd and make it super slow? I think not. They reserved the 3GB so that processes could be frozen and not lose data, lol.

This dude is tryin hard to find something positive about the xbone, I wonder how much this article cost MS?

Plus the fact that Kinect is laggy, inaccurate and most of the time flat out does not work.

Where-as the move is highly accurrate and provide 1:1 motion control on all axis’.

Tiger woods motion?
-On kinect you get only power meter motion.
-On Move you get full motion control, direction, power, speed, slice, etc.

Any game except maybe dance/workout games are better on move then kinect.

I have already been hearing developers saying the new kinect is still too laggy and inaccurate to be used for hardcore games like shooters, where as the move was awesome at shooters on ps3, with the new ps4 camera move will get even better then awesome!!

I really hope one day that kinect becomes a useful device, it would be the future of digital interaction if it was done right and actually worked. Cameras are not the way to do this type of motion control. Time of flight is a step in the right direction, hopefully by the time the 4-5th kinect comes out it will be closer to what the move has done on ps3 and beyond.

Is that why ps3 has first person shooters that support 256 players in one match?

Failed you have, into exile you must go….

the ps4 does have hardware support for cloud.

Its just that Sony actually has a capable console and doesnt need to supplement its power straight out of the box, as is required for xbone to at least start on even grounds.

What is cloud computing if not streaming data to your console? Compute then stream,lol.

Also GAikai is the world record holder for fastest internet streaming. Check Guiness.

Once the ps4’s base power has been tapped you can bet Sony will start adding more via streaming (aka cloud!!)

Of course ms is making a huge stink about it, its really the only way their console seems up to par. Byitself it would be lost in the woods,lol.

You buy what you want, but dont be fooled by concepts which are not real today, and possibly never will be.

What are the most popular genres? FPS, racers, sports etc, who are mostly likely to play these games? teeens, young adults etc. now do you think they will want to jog on the spot pretending they are a running soldier? or pretending they are steering a car with an invisible steering wheel?. can you think of a way Kinect can benefit the player in any of the most popular games like battlefield, fifa or skyrim? Its not the right device for gaming, its definitely good gadget but it has been given the wrong application. unless people start getting the massive 360 degree battlefield 3 simulator like they did on the gadget show (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nQR49JGySTM) then I don’t think it will benefit us. And if people could fit this in the living rooms it still takes away game mechanics such as the vaulting as there is no way to simulate that.

Its a nice thought but Kinect is not the future of gaming. and as for people saying developers will incorporate Kinect features if everyone has one, read this… http://www.edge-online.com/news/battlefield-4-head-dismisses-motion-control-as-a-gimmick/

What’s the matter? the truth hurt? fanboy!

you hurt my feelings man