<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Xbox One X Delivering Native 4K in Graphically Demanding Games Certainly Possible &#8211; Everspace Dev	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gamingbolt.com/xbox-one-x-delivering-native-4k-in-graphically-demanding-games-certainly-possible-everspace-dev/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gamingbolt.com/xbox-one-x-delivering-native-4k-in-graphically-demanding-games-certainly-possible-everspace-dev</link>
	<description>Get a Bolt of Gaming Now!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 03 Dec 2017 16:08:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Thierry Saint-Jour		</title>
		<link>https://gamingbolt.com/xbox-one-x-delivering-native-4k-in-graphically-demanding-games-certainly-possible-everspace-dev#comment-357895</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thierry Saint-Jour]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Dec 2017 16:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://gamingbolt.com/?p=314133#comment-357895</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://gamingbolt.com/xbox-one-x-delivering-native-4k-in-graphically-demanding-games-certainly-possible-everspace-dev#comment-357722&quot;&gt;MickaelSuarez&lt;/a&gt;.

LMAO ! So fun seeing the xf*gs being destroyed by facts. TY sir.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://gamingbolt.com/xbox-one-x-delivering-native-4k-in-graphically-demanding-games-certainly-possible-everspace-dev#comment-357722">MickaelSuarez</a>.</p>
<p>LMAO ! So fun seeing the xf*gs being destroyed by facts. TY sir.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Russia Good		</title>
		<link>https://gamingbolt.com/xbox-one-x-delivering-native-4k-in-graphically-demanding-games-certainly-possible-everspace-dev#comment-357876</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Russia Good]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Dec 2017 13:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://gamingbolt.com/?p=314133#comment-357876</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://gamingbolt.com/xbox-one-x-delivering-native-4k-in-graphically-demanding-games-certainly-possible-everspace-dev#comment-357529&quot;&gt;Leonardo Muniz&lt;/a&gt;.

yeah great lets spent 500$ for 1800p, true 4K? The PS4 Pro is the samrt choice]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://gamingbolt.com/xbox-one-x-delivering-native-4k-in-graphically-demanding-games-certainly-possible-everspace-dev#comment-357529">Leonardo Muniz</a>.</p>
<p>yeah great lets spent 500$ for 1800p, true 4K? The PS4 Pro is the samrt choice</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Russia Good		</title>
		<link>https://gamingbolt.com/xbox-one-x-delivering-native-4k-in-graphically-demanding-games-certainly-possible-everspace-dev#comment-357875</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Russia Good]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Dec 2017 13:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://gamingbolt.com/?p=314133#comment-357875</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[LOL no enjoy your 1800p for 500$]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL no enjoy your 1800p for 500$</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: mark0394		</title>
		<link>https://gamingbolt.com/xbox-one-x-delivering-native-4k-in-graphically-demanding-games-certainly-possible-everspace-dev#comment-357802</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mark0394]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Dec 2017 08:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://gamingbolt.com/?p=314133#comment-357802</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://gamingbolt.com/xbox-one-x-delivering-native-4k-in-graphically-demanding-games-certainly-possible-everspace-dev#comment-357722&quot;&gt;MickaelSuarez&lt;/a&gt;.

Its just a comment section... Do you really think anyone read all that ?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://gamingbolt.com/xbox-one-x-delivering-native-4k-in-graphically-demanding-games-certainly-possible-everspace-dev#comment-357722">MickaelSuarez</a>.</p>
<p>Its just a comment section&#8230; Do you really think anyone read all that ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: ALOty		</title>
		<link>https://gamingbolt.com/xbox-one-x-delivering-native-4k-in-graphically-demanding-games-certainly-possible-everspace-dev#comment-357742</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ALOty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2017 18:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://gamingbolt.com/?p=314133#comment-357742</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://gamingbolt.com/xbox-one-x-delivering-native-4k-in-graphically-demanding-games-certainly-possible-everspace-dev#comment-357625&quot;&gt;Mr Xrat&lt;/a&gt;.

watch movies (hd)--2017
I advise you, if you want to see the best quality movies, you can go to this site copy here &lt;b&gt;ALLMOVIESHD12.BLOGSPOT.COM
That&#039;s where I started it]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://gamingbolt.com/xbox-one-x-delivering-native-4k-in-graphically-demanding-games-certainly-possible-everspace-dev#comment-357625">Mr Xrat</a>.</p>
<p>watch movies (hd)&#8211;2017<br />
I advise you, if you want to see the best quality movies, you can go to this site copy here <b>ALLMOVIESHD12.BLOGSPOT.COM<br />
That&#8217;s where I started it</b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: J.j. Barrington		</title>
		<link>https://gamingbolt.com/xbox-one-x-delivering-native-4k-in-graphically-demanding-games-certainly-possible-everspace-dev#comment-357733</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[J.j. Barrington]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2017 16:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://gamingbolt.com/?p=314133#comment-357733</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thank heavens for adblock. 

C&#039;mon, guys. This isn&#039;t and won&#039;t ever be true.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank heavens for adblock. </p>
<p>C&#8217;mon, guys. This isn&#8217;t and won&#8217;t ever be true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: MickaelSuarez		</title>
		<link>https://gamingbolt.com/xbox-one-x-delivering-native-4k-in-graphically-demanding-games-certainly-possible-everspace-dev#comment-357722</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MickaelSuarez]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2017 13:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://gamingbolt.com/?p=314133#comment-357722</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://gamingbolt.com/xbox-one-x-delivering-native-4k-in-graphically-demanding-games-certainly-possible-everspace-dev#comment-357683&quot;&gt;Sp4ctr0&lt;/a&gt;.

https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/8cb54aafd33afa15b3decdc69273ced09f8d195c6cb4488774c070981aa6793f.png 
 https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/4c14265b017ff6868867a21bff17ee2fba907d4a264e45df6c9fe1d561c0e1d8.png 
Even with their own definition of &quot;4k&quot;, the 4k logo is not there...
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/69c797d1027781b053517a50a4af6a4de80295b42a39e31696ec4fdb49862584.jpg 

It has just remembered me your mad expectations about ARK:
 https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/c0b030a8d8fa33aeba687bbe1c01bbbce30c24e130d7d58f71a4cef57e948ebd.jpg 
 https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/f83e81fd9cb8d6116a33de7d2a5b4d299d3197a6ae40a3a7b8e45dbede9565ff.jpg 
It was a very dumb try, &#039;cause it was not high preset but epic...
 https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/b69ed1f9a20f9ff0ae89bd415f0648b28d76867414136d474f3eca9532b735c8.jpg 

So ARK is available on the X
ARK, the game you were so proud:
Jeremy Stieglitz told us recently:
&quot;On Xbox One X, ARK runs at 1440p 30 FPS, with settings approximately equivalent to &quot;PC High&quot;&quot;
&quot;It can run at 60fps 1080p with settings equivalent to PC &quot;Medium&quot;, we&#039;ll probably provide option to toggle between that or 30 FPS 1440p High&quot;

1440p High - benchmark from last february
 https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/4e77e9d59a04d7235652b7e5e25e207e314c9bc96cf9332c1ef7c0ba28c2b2d2.jpg
1080p Medium - benchmark from last february 
 https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/70c32528f7aa26e71a92045508ed1db08aecbd36dda277bb89b6fefc9de981d4.jpg 
and from PCGamer:
&quot;GTX 1060 6GB can almost manage a steady 60+ fps at 1080p medium&quot;
That&#039;s coherent...

So what really deliver the X ?
From DF
Normal mode: target 1080p 60fps,
Detail mode: target 1440p 30fps.
In both mode, dynamic resolution drops and frame rate drops...
 https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/3ac5634536e52e1716b76ee78cea9f149174523d2ca2ae4e817e95c56532f715.png 

Very far from your claim...

&quot;Xbox One X is 30% faster than GTX 1070&quot;
The proof of the pudding is in the eating

Star Wars Battlefront 2:
From DF:
X is inferior to PC ultra:
- Tessellation
- Resolution of normal maps and textures
- Shadows
- Reflection quality
- Environment details (X=Pro)
- Texture filtering (X=Pro)
And from NXGamer, it use checkerboarding.
This with a resolution of 1800p so -31% pixels, and from NXGamer: as low as 1620p so -44% pixels

So even with -31% to -44% pixels and inferior settings, it can&#039;t deliver a steady 60fps.
From your favourite benchmark website: 
 https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/2e2f51372834929488ecb2be986e4bfeacff1bb5c502fe5288b31cd3f4069b69.png 

Wolfenstein II:
From DF:
1 explosion during in-engine cutscene: -10% so 2052p
Characters (7!) on-screen: -10% so 2052p
Combat in one command room: -31% so 1656p and a framerate as low as 51fps
 https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/cc023dd053e456f55b9720aa9cc01cec752e969f4d289d2687e131a3d00194f1.png 
And from VGTech: as low as 1512p so less than half the pixels used during the benchmark on PC...

So even with -31% to -51% pixels and some inferior settings, it can&#039;t deliver a steady 60fps.
 https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/adffb4ae0c7163c6b80cb608906489b07fae9b10e7c6ada931d4987310382007.png 

Titanfall II:
From DF:
&quot;In-game pixel-counts in campaign gunplay now seem to vary between 1440p and around 1800p, only rising significantly higher to 4K and beyond when not much is going on (the initial stages of the tutorial remain the best area to see Respawn&#039;s dynamic super-sampling in effect).&quot;

So up to -66% pixels and some inferior settings...

Call Of Duty WWII:
From VGTech: 1430x2160 - 1920x2160
From DF:
&quot;Dynamic resolution is present across both consoles. PS4 Pro often comes in at 1920x2160, while on Xbox One X resolution regularly hits a full 3840x2160. Image quality is softer on PS4 Pro much of the time, though temporal AA creates a smooth looking presentation on both systems.&quot;
&quot;However, in some scenes horizontal resolution takes a visible hit on Xbox One, with image quality appearing similar to on PS4 Pro. &quot;
So 1920x2160 confirmed. -50% pixels

From your favourite benchmark website:
 https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/7d2f11e71cf90c82f41bf2d4553a20489dbeb9acf33a07f3103ffb243ab2e619.png 
A GTX 1070 deliver an average of 58fps with all the bells and whistle while the X can drops 50% to 63% of the pixels...

Assassin&#039;s Creed Origins:
From DF:
Lowest: 1656p
Highest: 2016p
Most common: Xbox One X between 1700p and 1800p and this with some inferior settings (ex: draw distance and LODs same as PlayStation 4 Pro).
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/cXRnRba9yFqjyH9YRowZJB.png
So a GTX 1070 is capable of 31.2fps on average with a &quot;True 4K no compromise&quot;, while the X drops 30% to 38% pixels during &quot;most common measurements&quot; and this with some inferior settings (ex: draw distance and LODs same as PlayStation 4 Pro).

Fortnite:
From VGtech: 1728p so -36% pixels
From your favourite benchmark website:
 https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/9a05a7567c229175d0b125fe4a0ffda96a5a0080e4ecd90a8d662ee68a40f5a4.png 
So a GTX 1070 is capable of 30fps on average with a &quot;True 4K no compromise&quot;, while the X drops 36% pixels...

Homefront:
From DF: 1800p so -30% pixels
From your favourite benchmark website:
http://gamegpu.com/images/stories/Test_GPU/Action/Homefront_The_Revolution/test/new2/h_3840.png
So a GTX 1070 is capable of 30fps on average with a &quot;True 4K no compromise&quot;, while the X drops 30% pixels...

Skyrim Special Edition:
From DF: as low as 2944x2160 - so -23% pixels, inferior settings and 30fps only.
From your favourite benchmark website:
http://gamegpu.com/images/stories/Test_GPU/RPG/Skyrim_Special_Edition/s_2011_3840.png
So a GTX 1070 is capable of 78fps on average with a &quot;True 4K no compromise&quot;, while the X can drops 23% pixels, and this with inferior settings and only 30fps...

Very far from your claim...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://gamingbolt.com/xbox-one-x-delivering-native-4k-in-graphically-demanding-games-certainly-possible-everspace-dev#comment-357683">Sp4ctr0</a>.</p>
<p><a href="https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/8cb54aafd33afa15b3decdc69273ced09f8d195c6cb4488774c070981aa6793f.png" rel="nofollow ugc">https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/8cb54aafd33afa15b3decdc69273ced09f8d195c6cb4488774c070981aa6793f.png</a><br />
 <a href="https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/4c14265b017ff6868867a21bff17ee2fba907d4a264e45df6c9fe1d561c0e1d8.png" rel="nofollow ugc">https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/4c14265b017ff6868867a21bff17ee2fba907d4a264e45df6c9fe1d561c0e1d8.png</a><br />
Even with their own definition of &#8220;4k&#8221;, the 4k logo is not there&#8230;<br />
<a href="https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/69c797d1027781b053517a50a4af6a4de80295b42a39e31696ec4fdb49862584.jpg" rel="nofollow ugc">https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/69c797d1027781b053517a50a4af6a4de80295b42a39e31696ec4fdb49862584.jpg</a> </p>
<p>It has just remembered me your mad expectations about ARK:<br />
 <a href="https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/c0b030a8d8fa33aeba687bbe1c01bbbce30c24e130d7d58f71a4cef57e948ebd.jpg" rel="nofollow ugc">https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/c0b030a8d8fa33aeba687bbe1c01bbbce30c24e130d7d58f71a4cef57e948ebd.jpg</a><br />
 <a href="https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/f83e81fd9cb8d6116a33de7d2a5b4d299d3197a6ae40a3a7b8e45dbede9565ff.jpg" rel="nofollow ugc">https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/f83e81fd9cb8d6116a33de7d2a5b4d299d3197a6ae40a3a7b8e45dbede9565ff.jpg</a><br />
It was a very dumb try, &#8217;cause it was not high preset but epic&#8230;<br />
 <a href="https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/b69ed1f9a20f9ff0ae89bd415f0648b28d76867414136d474f3eca9532b735c8.jpg" rel="nofollow ugc">https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/b69ed1f9a20f9ff0ae89bd415f0648b28d76867414136d474f3eca9532b735c8.jpg</a> </p>
<p>So ARK is available on the X<br />
ARK, the game you were so proud:<br />
Jeremy Stieglitz told us recently:<br />
&#8220;On Xbox One X, ARK runs at 1440p 30 FPS, with settings approximately equivalent to &#8220;PC High&#8221;&#8221;<br />
&#8220;It can run at 60fps 1080p with settings equivalent to PC &#8220;Medium&#8221;, we&#8217;ll probably provide option to toggle between that or 30 FPS 1440p High&#8221;</p>
<p>1440p High &#8211; benchmark from last february<br />
 <a href="https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/4e77e9d59a04d7235652b7e5e25e207e314c9bc96cf9332c1ef7c0ba28c2b2d2.jpg" rel="nofollow ugc">https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/4e77e9d59a04d7235652b7e5e25e207e314c9bc96cf9332c1ef7c0ba28c2b2d2.jpg</a><br />
1080p Medium &#8211; benchmark from last february<br />
 <a href="https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/70c32528f7aa26e71a92045508ed1db08aecbd36dda277bb89b6fefc9de981d4.jpg" rel="nofollow ugc">https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/70c32528f7aa26e71a92045508ed1db08aecbd36dda277bb89b6fefc9de981d4.jpg</a><br />
and from PCGamer:<br />
&#8220;GTX 1060 6GB can almost manage a steady 60+ fps at 1080p medium&#8221;<br />
That&#8217;s coherent&#8230;</p>
<p>So what really deliver the X ?<br />
From DF<br />
Normal mode: target 1080p 60fps,<br />
Detail mode: target 1440p 30fps.<br />
In both mode, dynamic resolution drops and frame rate drops&#8230;<br />
 <a href="https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/3ac5634536e52e1716b76ee78cea9f149174523d2ca2ae4e817e95c56532f715.png" rel="nofollow ugc">https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/3ac5634536e52e1716b76ee78cea9f149174523d2ca2ae4e817e95c56532f715.png</a> </p>
<p>Very far from your claim&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;Xbox One X is 30% faster than GTX 1070&#8221;<br />
The proof of the pudding is in the eating</p>
<p>Star Wars Battlefront 2:<br />
From DF:<br />
X is inferior to PC ultra:<br />
&#8211; Tessellation<br />
&#8211; Resolution of normal maps and textures<br />
&#8211; Shadows<br />
&#8211; Reflection quality<br />
&#8211; Environment details (X=Pro)<br />
&#8211; Texture filtering (X=Pro)<br />
And from NXGamer, it use checkerboarding.<br />
This with a resolution of 1800p so -31% pixels, and from NXGamer: as low as 1620p so -44% pixels</p>
<p>So even with -31% to -44% pixels and inferior settings, it can&#8217;t deliver a steady 60fps.<br />
From your favourite benchmark website:<br />
 <a href="https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/2e2f51372834929488ecb2be986e4bfeacff1bb5c502fe5288b31cd3f4069b69.png" rel="nofollow ugc">https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/2e2f51372834929488ecb2be986e4bfeacff1bb5c502fe5288b31cd3f4069b69.png</a> </p>
<p>Wolfenstein II:<br />
From DF:<br />
1 explosion during in-engine cutscene: -10% so 2052p<br />
Characters (7!) on-screen: -10% so 2052p<br />
Combat in one command room: -31% so 1656p and a framerate as low as 51fps<br />
 <a href="https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/cc023dd053e456f55b9720aa9cc01cec752e969f4d289d2687e131a3d00194f1.png" rel="nofollow ugc">https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/cc023dd053e456f55b9720aa9cc01cec752e969f4d289d2687e131a3d00194f1.png</a><br />
And from VGTech: as low as 1512p so less than half the pixels used during the benchmark on PC&#8230;</p>
<p>So even with -31% to -51% pixels and some inferior settings, it can&#8217;t deliver a steady 60fps.<br />
 <a href="https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/adffb4ae0c7163c6b80cb608906489b07fae9b10e7c6ada931d4987310382007.png" rel="nofollow ugc">https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/adffb4ae0c7163c6b80cb608906489b07fae9b10e7c6ada931d4987310382007.png</a> </p>
<p>Titanfall II:<br />
From DF:<br />
&#8220;In-game pixel-counts in campaign gunplay now seem to vary between 1440p and around 1800p, only rising significantly higher to 4K and beyond when not much is going on (the initial stages of the tutorial remain the best area to see Respawn&#8217;s dynamic super-sampling in effect).&#8221;</p>
<p>So up to -66% pixels and some inferior settings&#8230;</p>
<p>Call Of Duty WWII:<br />
From VGTech: 1430&#215;2160 &#8211; 1920&#215;2160<br />
From DF:<br />
&#8220;Dynamic resolution is present across both consoles. PS4 Pro often comes in at 1920&#215;2160, while on Xbox One X resolution regularly hits a full 3840&#215;2160. Image quality is softer on PS4 Pro much of the time, though temporal AA creates a smooth looking presentation on both systems.&#8221;<br />
&#8220;However, in some scenes horizontal resolution takes a visible hit on Xbox One, with image quality appearing similar to on PS4 Pro. &#8221;<br />
So 1920&#215;2160 confirmed. -50% pixels</p>
<p>From your favourite benchmark website:<br />
 <a href="https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/7d2f11e71cf90c82f41bf2d4553a20489dbeb9acf33a07f3103ffb243ab2e619.png" rel="nofollow ugc">https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/7d2f11e71cf90c82f41bf2d4553a20489dbeb9acf33a07f3103ffb243ab2e619.png</a><br />
A GTX 1070 deliver an average of 58fps with all the bells and whistle while the X can drops 50% to 63% of the pixels&#8230;</p>
<p>Assassin&#8217;s Creed Origins:<br />
From DF:<br />
Lowest: 1656p<br />
Highest: 2016p<br />
Most common: Xbox One X between 1700p and 1800p and this with some inferior settings (ex: draw distance and LODs same as PlayStation 4 Pro).<br />
<a href="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/cXRnRba9yFqjyH9YRowZJB.png" rel="nofollow ugc">https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/cXRnRba9yFqjyH9YRowZJB.png</a><br />
So a GTX 1070 is capable of 31.2fps on average with a &#8220;True 4K no compromise&#8221;, while the X drops 30% to 38% pixels during &#8220;most common measurements&#8221; and this with some inferior settings (ex: draw distance and LODs same as PlayStation 4 Pro).</p>
<p>Fortnite:<br />
From VGtech: 1728p so -36% pixels<br />
From your favourite benchmark website:<br />
 <a href="https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/9a05a7567c229175d0b125fe4a0ffda96a5a0080e4ecd90a8d662ee68a40f5a4.png" rel="nofollow ugc">https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/9a05a7567c229175d0b125fe4a0ffda96a5a0080e4ecd90a8d662ee68a40f5a4.png</a><br />
So a GTX 1070 is capable of 30fps on average with a &#8220;True 4K no compromise&#8221;, while the X drops 36% pixels&#8230;</p>
<p>Homefront:<br />
From DF: 1800p so -30% pixels<br />
From your favourite benchmark website:<br />
<a href="http://gamegpu.com/images/stories/Test_GPU/Action/Homefront_The_Revolution/test/new2/h_3840.png" rel="nofollow ugc">http://gamegpu.com/images/stories/Test_GPU/Action/Homefront_The_Revolution/test/new2/h_3840.png</a><br />
So a GTX 1070 is capable of 30fps on average with a &#8220;True 4K no compromise&#8221;, while the X drops 30% pixels&#8230;</p>
<p>Skyrim Special Edition:<br />
From DF: as low as 2944&#215;2160 &#8211; so -23% pixels, inferior settings and 30fps only.<br />
From your favourite benchmark website:<br />
<a href="http://gamegpu.com/images/stories/Test_GPU/RPG/Skyrim_Special_Edition/s_2011_3840.png" rel="nofollow ugc">http://gamegpu.com/images/stories/Test_GPU/RPG/Skyrim_Special_Edition/s_2011_3840.png</a><br />
So a GTX 1070 is capable of 78fps on average with a &#8220;True 4K no compromise&#8221;, while the X can drops 23% pixels, and this with inferior settings and only 30fps&#8230;</p>
<p>Very far from your claim&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: john		</title>
		<link>https://gamingbolt.com/xbox-one-x-delivering-native-4k-in-graphically-demanding-games-certainly-possible-everspace-dev#comment-357718</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[john]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2017 12:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://gamingbolt.com/?p=314133#comment-357718</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://gamingbolt.com/xbox-one-x-delivering-native-4k-in-graphically-demanding-games-certainly-possible-everspace-dev#comment-357529&quot;&gt;Leonardo Muniz&lt;/a&gt;.

Stupidity you console dudes now have some better hardware yet now you guys want to push the narrative what is 4k and what is wannabe 4k. Retarded comment sir very bias you corporate slave.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://gamingbolt.com/xbox-one-x-delivering-native-4k-in-graphically-demanding-games-certainly-possible-everspace-dev#comment-357529">Leonardo Muniz</a>.</p>
<p>Stupidity you console dudes now have some better hardware yet now you guys want to push the narrative what is 4k and what is wannabe 4k. Retarded comment sir very bias you corporate slave.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Randi		</title>
		<link>https://gamingbolt.com/xbox-one-x-delivering-native-4k-in-graphically-demanding-games-certainly-possible-everspace-dev#comment-357707</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Randi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2017 10:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://gamingbolt.com/?p=314133#comment-357707</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Google is paying 97$ per hour,with weekly payouts.You can also avail this.
On tuesday I got a brand new Land Rover Range Rover from having earned $11752 this last four weeks..with-out any doubt it&#039;s the most-comfortable job I have ever done .. It Sounds unbelievable but you wont forgive yourself if you don’t check it 
 fd346:
➽➽ 
➽➽;➽➽   &lt;a title=&quot;http://Google.com/Dailyjobs&quot; href=&quot;http://www.maxbiz70.%EF%BD%83om&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;http://GoogleDailyConsumerFactoryJornalsJobsReport1/easy/jobs...&lt;/a&gt; ★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫:::::fd346lhhh]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong></p>
<blockquote><p>Google is paying 97$ per hour,with weekly payouts.You can also avail this.<br />
On tuesday I got a brand new Land Rover Range Rover from having earned $11752 this last four weeks..with-out any doubt it&#8217;s the most-comfortable job I have ever done .. It Sounds unbelievable but you wont forgive yourself if you don’t check it<br />
 fd346:<br />
➽➽<br />
➽➽;➽➽   <a title="http://Google.com/Dailyjobs" href="http://www.maxbiz70.%EF%BD%83om" rel="nofollow"><strong><a href="http://GoogleDailyConsumerFactoryJornalsJobsReport1/easy/jobs" rel="nofollow ugc">http://GoogleDailyConsumerFactoryJornalsJobsReport1/easy/jobs</a>&#8230;</strong></a> ★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫:::::fd346lhhh</p></blockquote>
<p></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: D Spenc3		</title>
		<link>https://gamingbolt.com/xbox-one-x-delivering-native-4k-in-graphically-demanding-games-certainly-possible-everspace-dev#comment-357706</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[D Spenc3]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2017 10:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://gamingbolt.com/?p=314133#comment-357706</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://gamingbolt.com/xbox-one-x-delivering-native-4k-in-graphically-demanding-games-certainly-possible-everspace-dev#comment-357582&quot;&gt;Cha&lt;/a&gt;.

Pony losers]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://gamingbolt.com/xbox-one-x-delivering-native-4k-in-graphically-demanding-games-certainly-possible-everspace-dev#comment-357582">Cha</a>.</p>
<p>Pony losers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
