Very little so…they have lowered the bandwith limit with 70-80% in a year.

yep, agreed

coming from someone admitting theyre on drugs

xbove is far better than psn

Lol so what I don’t care about the cloud all I know is the forza horizon and Ryse are the best looking next gen games and I have owned all games on all consoles

Gamingbolt seems to have an obsession over Brad Wardell. Microsoft was lying about the cloud and so is Gamingbolt. Microsoft tried to lie and use “cloud” as an excuse to defend their weaker hardware.

Microsoft was asked if the PS4 hardware was stronger than the Xbox One hardware. It’s a simple yes or no question, but Microsoft avoided it each time and tried to damage control it by changing the topic. This is exactly what Microsoft stated, “Xbox One is stronger than the PS4 with the cloud.” Microsoft stated a lie because they didn’t want to admit that the Xbox One is weaker.

Cloud computing does offer benefits but in certain scenarios. Forza for example, uses the cloud to change up AI patterns. That doesn’t mean Forza has realistic AI which was another Microsoft lie. It means the AI “changes” from a very simple algorithm based on other players similar to procedurally generated maps like the Chalice Dungeons in Bloodborne. That doesn’t mean the AI is realistic in Forza what so ever. It’s more of a gimmick. Microsoft was also lying in that benchmark. The cloud was helping with destruction physics which doesn’t require low latency. I also highly doubt they were using an “optimized” high end PC with low level access to do that demo. An optimized high end PC with low level access would be able to process that.

Cloud computing helps manage large player counts and objects that can’t be run locally, such as Planetside 2, Battlefield, and Final Fantasy 14. Cloud will not help with polygons, textures, pixel counts, and ultimately “graphics” because of latency and synchronization with the computations being done locally. Good luck trying to send a gb of textures and polygons miles over the internet over a 20 mb internet connection with in miliseconds just in time for the rest of the local compute to be done. Your game will crash every time. That is why Titanfall ran at 792p at 40 fps on Xbox One. Cloud did absolutely jack sh*t for Xbox One and Titanfall. EA also could’ve used their own cloud servers for Titanfall which makes Microsoft’s marketting lies that much more obvious.

Microsoft was hoping you would believe that the cloud would boost Xbox One’s graphics and they thought you would buy an Xbox One if they fed you bs because they knew Xbox One is weaker. Cloud and dedicated servers are nothing new or exclusive to Microsoft. The internet has been around for a long time. If you do a little research you would know that Microsoft’s Azure cloud is made of a bunch of weak CPUs sitting in clusters which is laughable. Microsoft is good at conditioning the ignorant masses in to believing Microsoft is some sort of magic goose that sh*ts golden eggs.

Xbox fan boys are believing this because they refuse to accept that Microsoft lied. Oh, and they ignore the fact that Sony has the “cloud” also.

The difference is that Sony isn’t dumb enough to make false promises and outlandish claims that they know are impractical, unrealistic, and impossible to guarantee. Sony probably learned their lessons from last gen when they made claims about the PS3 that they knew were unlikely to happen due to other factors. Microsoft lied about Kinect also as a prime example of Microsoft’s false promises.

I find it funny how Gamingbolt says resolution gate is dumb, yet here they are obsessing over cloud and DX12 in every other article they write. This site full of hypocrisies and reeks of “please buy Xbox One”.

sorry i never open links to read stuff so u might want to type it here

More sales = more games. It’s simple. But if your logic helps you sleep at night….