<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Call of Duty 2016 Game Engine May Have Better Memory Optimization, Geometry And Texture Pipelines	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gamingbolt.com/call-of-duty-2016-game-engine-may-have-better-memory-optimization-geometry-and-texture-pipelines/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gamingbolt.com/call-of-duty-2016-game-engine-may-have-better-memory-optimization-geometry-and-texture-pipelines</link>
	<description>Get a Bolt of Gaming Now!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2016 17:45:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: d0x360		</title>
		<link>https://gamingbolt.com/call-of-duty-2016-game-engine-may-have-better-memory-optimization-geometry-and-texture-pipelines#comment-287977</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[d0x360]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2016 17:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamingbolt.com/?p=260336#comment-287977</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://gamingbolt.com/call-of-duty-2016-game-engine-may-have-better-memory-optimization-geometry-and-texture-pipelines#comment-287975&quot;&gt;Vittorio D&#039;Antuono&lt;/a&gt;.

I&#039;m already chill kiddo.   None of my posts are full of anger and misinformation.  Keep on at it though,  sooner or later you will say something smart.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://gamingbolt.com/call-of-duty-2016-game-engine-may-have-better-memory-optimization-geometry-and-texture-pipelines#comment-287975">Vittorio D&#8217;Antuono</a>.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m already chill kiddo.   None of my posts are full of anger and misinformation.  Keep on at it though,  sooner or later you will say something smart.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Vittorio D'Antuono		</title>
		<link>https://gamingbolt.com/call-of-duty-2016-game-engine-may-have-better-memory-optimization-geometry-and-texture-pipelines#comment-287975</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vittorio D'Antuono]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2016 17:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamingbolt.com/?p=260336#comment-287975</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://gamingbolt.com/call-of-duty-2016-game-engine-may-have-better-memory-optimization-geometry-and-texture-pipelines#comment-287951&quot;&gt;d0x360&lt;/a&gt;.

The same goes for you.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://gamingbolt.com/call-of-duty-2016-game-engine-may-have-better-memory-optimization-geometry-and-texture-pipelines#comment-287951">d0x360</a>.</p>
<p>The same goes for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: d0x360		</title>
		<link>https://gamingbolt.com/call-of-duty-2016-game-engine-may-have-better-memory-optimization-geometry-and-texture-pipelines#comment-287951</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[d0x360]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2016 14:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamingbolt.com/?p=260336#comment-287951</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://gamingbolt.com/call-of-duty-2016-game-engine-may-have-better-memory-optimization-geometry-and-texture-pipelines#comment-287944&quot;&gt;Vittorio D&#039;Antuono&lt;/a&gt;.

Seriously guy you need to chill the **** out and grow up]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://gamingbolt.com/call-of-duty-2016-game-engine-may-have-better-memory-optimization-geometry-and-texture-pipelines#comment-287944">Vittorio D&#8217;Antuono</a>.</p>
<p>Seriously guy you need to chill the **** out and grow up</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Vittorio D'Antuono		</title>
		<link>https://gamingbolt.com/call-of-duty-2016-game-engine-may-have-better-memory-optimization-geometry-and-texture-pipelines#comment-287944</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vittorio D'Antuono]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2016 13:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamingbolt.com/?p=260336#comment-287944</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://gamingbolt.com/call-of-duty-2016-game-engine-may-have-better-memory-optimization-geometry-and-texture-pipelines#comment-287942&quot;&gt;d0x360&lt;/a&gt;.

Was I supposed to laugh at what you said? It&#039;s not funny at all. 
I told you I&#039;m 21, I&#039;m not undergoing puberty anymore, probably you are.
Trust me, I absolutely know how to be taking jokes. The fact is, that this wasn&#039;t a joke, for me at least.
&quot;Proven wrong&quot;? I was right from the beginning of the discussion, I just didn&#039;t know that the IW engine had id tech technology at its core. So don&#039;t think you&#039;re the smart one who&#039;s right, because you&#039;re not. 
&quot;Improved fish AI&quot;? Is this fish thing ever going to end? Who cares about that freaking fish in Ghosts! IW made beautiful games like Cod4 and MW2 that I still play to these days. What, you only play to Battlefield? Because I like that one too. 
So stop treating me like a Cod fanboy that loves everything about Cod just for the sake of it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://gamingbolt.com/call-of-duty-2016-game-engine-may-have-better-memory-optimization-geometry-and-texture-pipelines#comment-287942">d0x360</a>.</p>
<p>Was I supposed to laugh at what you said? It&#8217;s not funny at all.<br />
I told you I&#8217;m 21, I&#8217;m not undergoing puberty anymore, probably you are.<br />
Trust me, I absolutely know how to be taking jokes. The fact is, that this wasn&#8217;t a joke, for me at least.<br />
&#8220;Proven wrong&#8221;? I was right from the beginning of the discussion, I just didn&#8217;t know that the IW engine had id tech technology at its core. So don&#8217;t think you&#8217;re the smart one who&#8217;s right, because you&#8217;re not.<br />
&#8220;Improved fish AI&#8221;? Is this fish thing ever going to end? Who cares about that freaking fish in Ghosts! IW made beautiful games like Cod4 and MW2 that I still play to these days. What, you only play to Battlefield? Because I like that one too.<br />
So stop treating me like a Cod fanboy that loves everything about Cod just for the sake of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: d0x360		</title>
		<link>https://gamingbolt.com/call-of-duty-2016-game-engine-may-have-better-memory-optimization-geometry-and-texture-pipelines#comment-287942</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[d0x360]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2016 13:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamingbolt.com/?p=260336#comment-287942</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://gamingbolt.com/call-of-duty-2016-game-engine-may-have-better-memory-optimization-geometry-and-texture-pipelines#comment-287911&quot;&gt;Vittorio D&#039;Antuono&lt;/a&gt;.

Lol you are going to harp on an auto correct typo when you spent multiple posts looking like a fool then posting a link proving your own argument wrong.

Smooth brother smooth, maybe stay off the internet till puberty is over. Trust me you won&#039;t be as numb in the head nor will you care about fanboy nonsense and argue with someone who can be proven right with about 5 seconds of research.

Hey!   Maybe your next best awesome amazing cod game will have improved fish AI.  It could happen.

Also for your own sake... Lighten up and learn to take a joke.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://gamingbolt.com/call-of-duty-2016-game-engine-may-have-better-memory-optimization-geometry-and-texture-pipelines#comment-287911">Vittorio D&#8217;Antuono</a>.</p>
<p>Lol you are going to harp on an auto correct typo when you spent multiple posts looking like a fool then posting a link proving your own argument wrong.</p>
<p>Smooth brother smooth, maybe stay off the internet till puberty is over. Trust me you won&#8217;t be as numb in the head nor will you care about fanboy nonsense and argue with someone who can be proven right with about 5 seconds of research.</p>
<p>Hey!   Maybe your next best awesome amazing cod game will have improved fish AI.  It could happen.</p>
<p>Also for your own sake&#8230; Lighten up and learn to take a joke.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Vittorio D'Antuono		</title>
		<link>https://gamingbolt.com/call-of-duty-2016-game-engine-may-have-better-memory-optimization-geometry-and-texture-pipelines#comment-287911</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vittorio D'Antuono]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2016 02:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamingbolt.com/?p=260336#comment-287911</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://gamingbolt.com/call-of-duty-2016-game-engine-may-have-better-memory-optimization-geometry-and-texture-pipelines#comment-287910&quot;&gt;d0x360&lt;/a&gt;.

Says the one that writes &quot;Eugene&quot; instead of Engine. Nevertheless, I don&#039;t care. It uses a different rendering path, fine. But it&#039;s not called &quot;id tech 3&quot; anymore, it&#039;s been called &quot;IW Engine&quot; since the 2nd Cod title. If I&#039;m stupid, then you must be mentally challenged.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://gamingbolt.com/call-of-duty-2016-game-engine-may-have-better-memory-optimization-geometry-and-texture-pipelines#comment-287910">d0x360</a>.</p>
<p>Says the one that writes &#8220;Eugene&#8221; instead of Engine. Nevertheless, I don&#8217;t care. It uses a different rendering path, fine. But it&#8217;s not called &#8220;id tech 3&#8221; anymore, it&#8217;s been called &#8220;IW Engine&#8221; since the 2nd Cod title. If I&#8217;m stupid, then you must be mentally challenged.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: d0x360		</title>
		<link>https://gamingbolt.com/call-of-duty-2016-game-engine-may-have-better-memory-optimization-geometry-and-texture-pipelines#comment-287910</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[d0x360]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2016 01:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamingbolt.com/?p=260336#comment-287910</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://gamingbolt.com/call-of-duty-2016-game-engine-may-have-better-memory-optimization-geometry-and-texture-pipelines#comment-287909&quot;&gt;Vittorio D&#039;Antuono&lt;/a&gt;.

Its the SAME Eugene with a modified rendering path.   Sometimes I like to think people aren&#039;t as stupid as these seem but you... You are]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://gamingbolt.com/call-of-duty-2016-game-engine-may-have-better-memory-optimization-geometry-and-texture-pipelines#comment-287909">Vittorio D&#8217;Antuono</a>.</p>
<p>Its the SAME Eugene with a modified rendering path.   Sometimes I like to think people aren&#8217;t as stupid as these seem but you&#8230; You are</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Vittorio D'Antuono		</title>
		<link>https://gamingbolt.com/call-of-duty-2016-game-engine-may-have-better-memory-optimization-geometry-and-texture-pipelines#comment-287909</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vittorio D'Antuono]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2016 01:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamingbolt.com/?p=260336#comment-287909</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://gamingbolt.com/call-of-duty-2016-game-engine-may-have-better-memory-optimization-geometry-and-texture-pipelines#comment-287908&quot;&gt;d0x360&lt;/a&gt;.

Yeah but it&#039;s not freaking id tech 3! That&#039;s a different engine, in fact you also have id Tech 4 around! IW might be based on that id Tech engine but it&#039;s still a different one! Btw enough with this, no need to fight over this stupid topic. I&#039;m not a &quot;cod fanboy&quot; that&#039;s the &quot;core&quot; of the point I was trying to make.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://gamingbolt.com/call-of-duty-2016-game-engine-may-have-better-memory-optimization-geometry-and-texture-pipelines#comment-287908">d0x360</a>.</p>
<p>Yeah but it&#8217;s not freaking id tech 3! That&#8217;s a different engine, in fact you also have id Tech 4 around! IW might be based on that id Tech engine but it&#8217;s still a different one! Btw enough with this, no need to fight over this stupid topic. I&#8217;m not a &#8220;cod fanboy&#8221; that&#8217;s the &#8220;core&#8221; of the point I was trying to make.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: d0x360		</title>
		<link>https://gamingbolt.com/call-of-duty-2016-game-engine-may-have-better-memory-optimization-geometry-and-texture-pipelines#comment-287908</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[d0x360]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2016 01:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamingbolt.com/?p=260336#comment-287908</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://gamingbolt.com/call-of-duty-2016-game-engine-may-have-better-memory-optimization-geometry-and-texture-pipelines#comment-287906&quot;&gt;Vittorio D&#039;Antuono&lt;/a&gt;.

ROFL right From the link YOU POSTED

The IW engine is a game engine developed by Infinity Ward, Treyarch, and Sledgehammer Games for the Call of Duty series. The engine uses id Tech 3 as its core,

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA at its core!!!!!!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://gamingbolt.com/call-of-duty-2016-game-engine-may-have-better-memory-optimization-geometry-and-texture-pipelines#comment-287906">Vittorio D&#8217;Antuono</a>.</p>
<p>ROFL right From the link YOU POSTED</p>
<p>The IW engine is a game engine developed by Infinity Ward, Treyarch, and Sledgehammer Games for the Call of Duty series. The engine uses id Tech 3 as its core,</p>
<p>HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA at its core!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: d0x360		</title>
		<link>https://gamingbolt.com/call-of-duty-2016-game-engine-may-have-better-memory-optimization-geometry-and-texture-pipelines#comment-287907</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[d0x360]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2016 01:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamingbolt.com/?p=260336#comment-287907</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://gamingbolt.com/call-of-duty-2016-game-engine-may-have-better-memory-optimization-geometry-and-texture-pipelines#comment-287906&quot;&gt;Vittorio D&#039;Antuono&lt;/a&gt;.

Wrong... Wrong...wrong.   Sorry kiddo but you go on and keep acting all internet cool guy for the 8 people who visit this site]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://gamingbolt.com/call-of-duty-2016-game-engine-may-have-better-memory-optimization-geometry-and-texture-pipelines#comment-287906">Vittorio D&#8217;Antuono</a>.</p>
<p>Wrong&#8230; Wrong&#8230;wrong.   Sorry kiddo but you go on and keep acting all internet cool guy for the 8 people who visit this site</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
