<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Can Fable 4 Redeem The Falling Franchise?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gamingbolt.com/can-fable-4-redeem-the-falling-franchise/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gamingbolt.com/can-fable-4-redeem-the-falling-franchise</link>
	<description>Get a Bolt of Gaming Now!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2016 15:33:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Noel		</title>
		<link>https://gamingbolt.com/can-fable-4-redeem-the-falling-franchise#comment-288563</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Noel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2016 15:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamingbolt.com/?p=20989#comment-288563</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://gamingbolt.com/can-fable-4-redeem-the-falling-franchise#comment-150019&quot;&gt;Kurokon Shikyo&lt;/a&gt;.

Agree, agree, agree. FABLE 4, microsoft!! Make it happen! Save the Xbox:One! Look at Skyrim and the Witcher 3, then make it with the same scope and depth but make it a &quot;Fable&quot; world!!!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://gamingbolt.com/can-fable-4-redeem-the-falling-franchise#comment-150019">Kurokon Shikyo</a>.</p>
<p>Agree, agree, agree. FABLE 4, microsoft!! Make it happen! Save the Xbox:One! Look at Skyrim and the Witcher 3, then make it with the same scope and depth but make it a &#8220;Fable&#8221; world!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Oats		</title>
		<link>https://gamingbolt.com/can-fable-4-redeem-the-falling-franchise#comment-197242</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Oats]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jun 2013 08:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamingbolt.com/?p=20989#comment-197242</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://gamingbolt.com/can-fable-4-redeem-the-falling-franchise#comment-189084&quot;&gt;Juliana Brown&lt;/a&gt;.

Agreed, and thank you!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://gamingbolt.com/can-fable-4-redeem-the-falling-franchise#comment-189084">Juliana Brown</a>.</p>
<p>Agreed, and thank you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: mbeecon		</title>
		<link>https://gamingbolt.com/can-fable-4-redeem-the-falling-franchise#comment-191475</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mbeecon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 17:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamingbolt.com/?p=20989#comment-191475</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Fable 4: The Old Kingdom - The only real way to save the franchise, bring back the normal fantasy from the first game and give us some abilities that are actually, you know, different. Magic has turned into whatever color you prefer; like blue? Use lightning. Like Orange? Use fireball. Here&#039;s hoping the developers can actually listen to the community for once and try to give it&#039;s fans something they actually want, rather than saying &quot;This is what you all REALLY want, right?&quot;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fable 4: The Old Kingdom &#8211; The only real way to save the franchise, bring back the normal fantasy from the first game and give us some abilities that are actually, you know, different. Magic has turned into whatever color you prefer; like blue? Use lightning. Like Orange? Use fireball. Here&#8217;s hoping the developers can actually listen to the community for once and try to give it&#8217;s fans something they actually want, rather than saying &#8220;This is what you all REALLY want, right?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Juliana Brown		</title>
		<link>https://gamingbolt.com/can-fable-4-redeem-the-falling-franchise#comment-189084</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Juliana Brown]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Mar 2013 22:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamingbolt.com/?p=20989#comment-189084</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The whole series was great and improved exponentially with each installment. It got bigger... the story line kept improving and having more and more depth. Dialogue had more relevance.. the characters became written better and better. If you like stale acting and bland, undeveloped characters then definitely stick with Elder Scrolls and listen to Jim Cummings force himself on 20 more characters. 

My main issue with Fable 1 was the total lack of a female player option.... so I&#039;m personally going to have to completely disagree with anyone who says Fable 1 had the best character customization. No.. it did not. I found it hard to rpg with some hulking dude who... I get punished with a more and more grotesque body the more I improve my skills... This made the game boring and almost unplayable for me personally. 

I could personally totally do without the armor and am glad it did not play in the 2nd and 3rd game. I personally don&#039;t have a desire to be a big hulking mass of metal to be able to battle. 

For those who claim that Fable 3 lost the humor... I&#039;m willing to bet they simply power housed through the main story line as quickly as possible so they could go and write a bitchy article about it as quickly as possible. I completely disagree that it&#039;s become broody and less humorous. Only that... most of the humor seems focused more around side quests which are all cute and funny.. and/or you have a weak grasp on british humor. (like... everything that came out of Reaver&#039;s mouth for example) Fable 3 is loaded with humor!

While I do agree some of the moral decisions were objective... (i.e. I did not always agree with what they decided was good or bad) it really didn&#039;t get my panties in that much of a bunch... It&#039;s a game... whatever. *shrug* 

Also there were no bows and arrows in the third game because it was pre industrial era you ar-tard.... You really wouldn&#039;t be particularly effective against anybody with one anymore. And the time setting... set us up for a bunch of other story points... the entire Reaver industries thing for one which I found fantastically entertaining. The whole steampunk setting of everything was absolutely charming and great.

So yeah... guys... bottom line is... if you don&#039;t like Fable... and you like Elder Scrolls and all those.... then play Elder Scrolls games.... and all the games that do fit your desire for fetch quests and pretentious, macho story and gameplay.... and stop trying trying to turn everything into what YOU like. You don&#039;t like Fable then piss off... we won&#039;t miss you! Have fun exploring the 87th identical Dwemer ruin or Nord burial catacombs....

Tatty bye!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The whole series was great and improved exponentially with each installment. It got bigger&#8230; the story line kept improving and having more and more depth. Dialogue had more relevance.. the characters became written better and better. If you like stale acting and bland, undeveloped characters then definitely stick with Elder Scrolls and listen to Jim Cummings force himself on 20 more characters. </p>
<p>My main issue with Fable 1 was the total lack of a female player option&#8230;. so I&#8217;m personally going to have to completely disagree with anyone who says Fable 1 had the best character customization. No.. it did not. I found it hard to rpg with some hulking dude who&#8230; I get punished with a more and more grotesque body the more I improve my skills&#8230; This made the game boring and almost unplayable for me personally. </p>
<p>I could personally totally do without the armor and am glad it did not play in the 2nd and 3rd game. I personally don&#8217;t have a desire to be a big hulking mass of metal to be able to battle. </p>
<p>For those who claim that Fable 3 lost the humor&#8230; I&#8217;m willing to bet they simply power housed through the main story line as quickly as possible so they could go and write a bitchy article about it as quickly as possible. I completely disagree that it&#8217;s become broody and less humorous. Only that&#8230; most of the humor seems focused more around side quests which are all cute and funny.. and/or you have a weak grasp on british humor. (like&#8230; everything that came out of Reaver&#8217;s mouth for example) Fable 3 is loaded with humor!</p>
<p>While I do agree some of the moral decisions were objective&#8230; (i.e. I did not always agree with what they decided was good or bad) it really didn&#8217;t get my panties in that much of a bunch&#8230; It&#8217;s a game&#8230; whatever. *shrug* </p>
<p>Also there were no bows and arrows in the third game because it was pre industrial era you ar-tard&#8230;. You really wouldn&#8217;t be particularly effective against anybody with one anymore. And the time setting&#8230; set us up for a bunch of other story points&#8230; the entire Reaver industries thing for one which I found fantastically entertaining. The whole steampunk setting of everything was absolutely charming and great.</p>
<p>So yeah&#8230; guys&#8230; bottom line is&#8230; if you don&#8217;t like Fable&#8230; and you like Elder Scrolls and all those&#8230;. then play Elder Scrolls games&#8230;. and all the games that do fit your desire for fetch quests and pretentious, macho story and gameplay&#8230;. and stop trying trying to turn everything into what YOU like. You don&#8217;t like Fable then piss off&#8230; we won&#8217;t miss you! Have fun exploring the 87th identical Dwemer ruin or Nord burial catacombs&#8230;.</p>
<p>Tatty bye!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: xxmodnarxx		</title>
		<link>https://gamingbolt.com/can-fable-4-redeem-the-falling-franchise#comment-178080</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[xxmodnarxx]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2012 21:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamingbolt.com/?p=20989#comment-178080</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://gamingbolt.com/can-fable-4-redeem-the-falling-franchise#comment-141767&quot;&gt;FABLE 1!!!!&lt;/a&gt;.

I wouldn&#039;t buy the same game if all it got was an unneeded graphics update. It might sound like a good idea, but graphics don&#039;t make a game, especially when the graphics of the game in question aren&#039;t even that outdated.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://gamingbolt.com/can-fable-4-redeem-the-falling-franchise#comment-141767">FABLE 1!!!!</a>.</p>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t buy the same game if all it got was an unneeded graphics update. It might sound like a good idea, but graphics don&#8217;t make a game, especially when the graphics of the game in question aren&#8217;t even that outdated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: xxmodnarxx		</title>
		<link>https://gamingbolt.com/can-fable-4-redeem-the-falling-franchise#comment-178077</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[xxmodnarxx]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2012 21:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamingbolt.com/?p=20989#comment-178077</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://gamingbolt.com/can-fable-4-redeem-the-falling-franchise#comment-155760&quot;&gt;Frederick&lt;/a&gt;.

Final Fantasy and Kingdom Hearts wants to have a word with you... and I thought Fallout was an RPS (Role Playing Shooter). If it is... it doesn&#039;t count. ;o I wholeheartedly agree with TES, but have only played Fable 1/TLC so I can&#039;t give my opinion on Fable.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://gamingbolt.com/can-fable-4-redeem-the-falling-franchise#comment-155760">Frederick</a>.</p>
<p>Final Fantasy and Kingdom Hearts wants to have a word with you&#8230; and I thought Fallout was an RPS (Role Playing Shooter). If it is&#8230; it doesn&#8217;t count. ;o I wholeheartedly agree with TES, but have only played Fable 1/TLC so I can&#8217;t give my opinion on Fable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: chaz		</title>
		<link>https://gamingbolt.com/can-fable-4-redeem-the-falling-franchise#comment-171544</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chaz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2012 20:58:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamingbolt.com/?p=20989#comment-171544</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://gamingbolt.com/can-fable-4-redeem-the-falling-franchise#comment-145364&quot;&gt;Jared&lt;/a&gt;.

there were no dogs in fable 1, but yeah cool ideas]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://gamingbolt.com/can-fable-4-redeem-the-falling-franchise#comment-145364">Jared</a>.</p>
<p>there were no dogs in fable 1, but yeah cool ideas</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: chaz		</title>
		<link>https://gamingbolt.com/can-fable-4-redeem-the-falling-franchise#comment-171539</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chaz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2012 20:46:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamingbolt.com/?p=20989#comment-171539</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://gamingbolt.com/can-fable-4-redeem-the-falling-franchise#comment-138225&quot;&gt;Brendan&lt;/a&gt;.

if you have not realized, that blind person is most likely Theresa, so maybe it&#039;s in between Fable 1 and 2...

HOPEFULLY...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://gamingbolt.com/can-fable-4-redeem-the-falling-franchise#comment-138225">Brendan</a>.</p>
<p>if you have not realized, that blind person is most likely Theresa, so maybe it&#8217;s in between Fable 1 and 2&#8230;</p>
<p>HOPEFULLY&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: chaz		</title>
		<link>https://gamingbolt.com/can-fable-4-redeem-the-falling-franchise#comment-171538</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chaz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2012 20:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamingbolt.com/?p=20989#comment-171538</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://gamingbolt.com/can-fable-4-redeem-the-falling-franchise#comment-135206&quot;&gt;Jon&lt;/a&gt;.

YES, I completely agree, going back in time to Scythes error would be awesome. Bringing back the heroes guild would win me over, I extremely disliked how leveling up was done by opening chests, instead of at a special place in the map room of the Guild. 

Another Point, they need to have no guns, the guns make the game way to easy to appoint where you can just blow by enemies without trying, the biggest enemy was so weak. If they could just go have a prequel to the original Fable, and have armor and bows, instead of clothes and guns, it would be a terrific game!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://gamingbolt.com/can-fable-4-redeem-the-falling-franchise#comment-135206">Jon</a>.</p>
<p>YES, I completely agree, going back in time to Scythes error would be awesome. Bringing back the heroes guild would win me over, I extremely disliked how leveling up was done by opening chests, instead of at a special place in the map room of the Guild. </p>
<p>Another Point, they need to have no guns, the guns make the game way to easy to appoint where you can just blow by enemies without trying, the biggest enemy was so weak. If they could just go have a prequel to the original Fable, and have armor and bows, instead of clothes and guns, it would be a terrific game!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: craizerduke88		</title>
		<link>https://gamingbolt.com/can-fable-4-redeem-the-falling-franchise#comment-167383</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[craizerduke88]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2012 06:30:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamingbolt.com/?p=20989#comment-167383</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[fable 1- awesome, it had memorable and bad*** characters like jack of blades who NEEDS to be in the 4th one somehow, actually had armor and cool weapons. the story was grade A material but they should have gotten deeper in the families legacy but whatever. the combat was actually enjoyable  and the locations were interesting for the time the game was created. and the enemies were sometimes really difficult which is a good thing and you had to figure out how to kill the enemy like jacks minions were defeated easily with magic and trolls were killed easy long ranged. exploration was limited but not too many games were better with free roam at the time

fable 2- characters were weaker and less memorable the only one i remember is Teresa and reaver but that&#039;s cause Teresa is in all of them which is pretty cool and reavers in the second and third one and hes pretty funny, and the characters were shit in fights especially the she-hulk(i forget her name) lucien was kinda a good antagonist but their wasn&#039;t even a boss battle for him like jack had two of them. i liked how a little of the the first one is mentioned but that&#039;s was it, he dident he find out he was part of this great family with a dark past. enemies were weak, boring and forgettable except for balverines but they were WAY to easy, they just took every hit jumped over me and took more hits and i used like 5 health potions throughout the whole game, the magic was shit especially when you had to charge it up the randed was pretty good and the melee was alright , for every fun mission(ex.oakfeild massacre, and getting to bloodstone) there were like 5 boring ones and all the cool jobs were to f**kin easy like killin beetles or killing some lesbian in bowerstone. the dog was shit, he found shit treasure even with fully upgraded stats(i think the best he ever found was a condom) never told me about silver keys until i found them myself and that&#039;s when he isent scared which is all the time, couldn&#039;t fight or he just refused to and i healed him more times than i had to one myself. is was cool how he changed his appereance if you were good or bad but it really dident matter cause he acted the same way. and he loved you no matter how many times i scolded him but the dog idea was still pretty cool. i wont say anything about the graphics cause their pretty good. and no armor REALLY how do clothes stop musket rounds and swords but im not gonna rant cause everyone knows what im talking about. and that stupid breadcrumb trail had me staring at the floor hoping it doesent disappear or mislead me as it always does, i prefer a mini map. the economy and family stuff were a great addition even if it is really easy to get people to fall in love with you and almost all the girls look alike well the good looking ones do.even after all that i still like this game, is it as good as the first one hell no but its still fun so dont get me wrong i do like this game

fable 3- the characters were a little stronger in this one cause i actually remember most their names so i wont talk about them too much and their fighting were improved greatly. the fighting was complete and utter garbage. the melee was WAY to drawn out, it took about 7 minutes with flourishes and all that to kill a single enemy and thats if their by themself which they never are for obvious reasons. the magic is actually overpowered in this one so i dident even use it so it was a &#039;&#039;fair&#039;&#039; fight. i pretty much used my gun the whole game cause it wasent complete shit or overpowered. the main enemy the darkness was actually intresting for only one reason, im pretty sure the crawler is a reinvented jack of blades. i know it sounds crazy but if you listen to him  all he talks about is how he waited centuries for albion to burn which is what jack always said and he waited for the main character whose great ancestors (dude from fable one) originally defeated him, and the guardians that the darkness use look just like jacks minions from the first one. the combat difficulty got even worse because i dident even use one health potion and all the regular enemies were boring, weak, and forgettable again. they still have no armour the clothes are actually worse and theres like 5 clothing options 3 of which are retarted. they made use pay for the the color black which is pretty dickheadish on their part like why would they do that to their loyal fans.theirs no boss fight with loghain even though the trailer showed one and the fight with the crawler did not make up for that.the the dog dident change one bit they just lowered the amount of shit treasure.

so what fable 4 needs is memborable characters, enemies that actually give the gamer a challenge, jack of blades, go back to the time of heroes, go deeper into the story and history of this heroic bloodline, more stuff to buy and customize, bigger and more interesting locations with more free roam, and better in game options that effect future gameplay. there&#039;s definitively more but thats all i can think of]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>fable 1- awesome, it had memorable and bad*** characters like jack of blades who NEEDS to be in the 4th one somehow, actually had armor and cool weapons. the story was grade A material but they should have gotten deeper in the families legacy but whatever. the combat was actually enjoyable  and the locations were interesting for the time the game was created. and the enemies were sometimes really difficult which is a good thing and you had to figure out how to kill the enemy like jacks minions were defeated easily with magic and trolls were killed easy long ranged. exploration was limited but not too many games were better with free roam at the time</p>
<p>fable 2- characters were weaker and less memorable the only one i remember is Teresa and reaver but that&#8217;s cause Teresa is in all of them which is pretty cool and reavers in the second and third one and hes pretty funny, and the characters were shit in fights especially the she-hulk(i forget her name) lucien was kinda a good antagonist but their wasn&#8217;t even a boss battle for him like jack had two of them. i liked how a little of the the first one is mentioned but that&#8217;s was it, he dident he find out he was part of this great family with a dark past. enemies were weak, boring and forgettable except for balverines but they were WAY to easy, they just took every hit jumped over me and took more hits and i used like 5 health potions throughout the whole game, the magic was shit especially when you had to charge it up the randed was pretty good and the melee was alright , for every fun mission(ex.oakfeild massacre, and getting to bloodstone) there were like 5 boring ones and all the cool jobs were to f**kin easy like killin beetles or killing some lesbian in bowerstone. the dog was shit, he found shit treasure even with fully upgraded stats(i think the best he ever found was a condom) never told me about silver keys until i found them myself and that&#8217;s when he isent scared which is all the time, couldn&#8217;t fight or he just refused to and i healed him more times than i had to one myself. is was cool how he changed his appereance if you were good or bad but it really dident matter cause he acted the same way. and he loved you no matter how many times i scolded him but the dog idea was still pretty cool. i wont say anything about the graphics cause their pretty good. and no armor REALLY how do clothes stop musket rounds and swords but im not gonna rant cause everyone knows what im talking about. and that stupid breadcrumb trail had me staring at the floor hoping it doesent disappear or mislead me as it always does, i prefer a mini map. the economy and family stuff were a great addition even if it is really easy to get people to fall in love with you and almost all the girls look alike well the good looking ones do.even after all that i still like this game, is it as good as the first one hell no but its still fun so dont get me wrong i do like this game</p>
<p>fable 3- the characters were a little stronger in this one cause i actually remember most their names so i wont talk about them too much and their fighting were improved greatly. the fighting was complete and utter garbage. the melee was WAY to drawn out, it took about 7 minutes with flourishes and all that to kill a single enemy and thats if their by themself which they never are for obvious reasons. the magic is actually overpowered in this one so i dident even use it so it was a &#8221;fair&#8221; fight. i pretty much used my gun the whole game cause it wasent complete shit or overpowered. the main enemy the darkness was actually intresting for only one reason, im pretty sure the crawler is a reinvented jack of blades. i know it sounds crazy but if you listen to him  all he talks about is how he waited centuries for albion to burn which is what jack always said and he waited for the main character whose great ancestors (dude from fable one) originally defeated him, and the guardians that the darkness use look just like jacks minions from the first one. the combat difficulty got even worse because i dident even use one health potion and all the regular enemies were boring, weak, and forgettable again. they still have no armour the clothes are actually worse and theres like 5 clothing options 3 of which are retarted. they made use pay for the the color black which is pretty dickheadish on their part like why would they do that to their loyal fans.theirs no boss fight with loghain even though the trailer showed one and the fight with the crawler did not make up for that.the the dog dident change one bit they just lowered the amount of shit treasure.</p>
<p>so what fable 4 needs is memborable characters, enemies that actually give the gamer a challenge, jack of blades, go back to the time of heroes, go deeper into the story and history of this heroic bloodline, more stuff to buy and customize, bigger and more interesting locations with more free roam, and better in game options that effect future gameplay. there&#8217;s definitively more but thats all i can think of</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
