Still no.

LMAO I’m cracking up

all you have to do is look at cryengine 4 screenshots, think the ps4 can render that in realtime in gameplay? nope, but cryengine is more optimised for lower end hardware (according to crytek) but cryengine is a multiplatform engine and wont run as good as a custom built one specifically ps4 or x1 so needs more power… also theyll be competing with PC’s cus multiplats will have PC in and can already see how thats turning out 900p 30

How would you know are you a ps4 dev and can state that 4 fact?

What’s up derp? now heres the thing. For the very fact that this topic is so much debated upon proves that, depends on how the upscaler in the Xb1 is used, XB1 720p can equal Ps4 900p. Think about it Derp. I’m only a consumer, not no pixel counting technician. I went into my neighborhood gaming store and lo and behold, they have their own comparison going on. A crowd of gaming geeks gathering around and in in discussion.

The conclusion is w/o the aid of a pixel counter, as far as the eyes can see, BF4 on the XB1 wins anonymously, hands down. No if’s and buts about it. It just look a slight better to the eyes. lighting, clarity, texture quality ect. Now if what you see don’t matter to you because you’re in love with a brand. Like you for instance. You have an unhealthy love for sony? Then you would head on to a site like eurogamer for a total dismantling of the game through a pixel count.

My question is, if it is so obvious that the PS4 is 50% superior, why do you have to peep through a microscope to see it, ala pixel count. Why does it have to be announced that this game is that p and this game is this p? Why, because in some cases you simply cannot tell with the naked eye. That’s why Euro have a pixel counter. To tell you what you cannot see with your naked eyes, or to point out things you normally wouldn’t notice while playing an intense game like BF4. But what was that Eurogamer was saying about both versions before the pixel count derp? What was their conclusion from just looking at the game with the naked eye? Didn’t they say the XB1 ver. looked better?

What does that say for the tech in XB1 when games on it running at 720p matches games on PS4 running 900p? What does that say for the tech in XB1 and what does that say for the tech in PS4? Why is 720p on the XB1 can equal 900p on the PS4 derp?

How do you define power looking at the games on both systems? If you stay away from the propaganda, remove the fanboy goggles, and think for yourself for once, you’d realize the p’s in a game don’t matter, there’s more to it than than that. What I’m saying is, how do you say PS4 is more powerful when 900p on it is hardly distinguishable from 720p on the XB1? Mind you, these games on the XB1 are being created with crippled horrible SDK’s and tools. What will happen when the tools catch up?

Except Ryse uses ESram correctly which the PS4 lacks. So expect the same.

Lol your completely wrong. In your logic a V6 will never out perform a V8??? Thief on X1 rans at 900p yet utlises more effects then the PS4 version running at 1080p. The gap is alot closer then your pretend 50% more powerful. Its claimed and fact at 50% faster. You fanboys turned it into 50% more powerful. Cute.

Id believe Crytek, AMD, INVIDIA AND INTEL over you and the rest of the 12 year old kids.

That’s wrong. The PS4 has better hardware that the XB1 cannot overcome no matter what they optimize on the hardware, as the PS4 can also optimize as well. It’ll always be 2nd performance wise.

#2, Crytek has not yet made a game for the PS4, so at this point, they haven’t even tried optimizing their engine to utilize PS4’s power even though they optimized XB1’s for their eSRAM.

Infamous is the best looking next gen game by a long way tbph.

Im playing through it now and some of the scenes are mind blowing.

Better looking than any game on the X1.

This shows how powerful the PS4 is and will only get better in the future.

The X1 would do well to raise its standards to this level.

Graphically light years ahead of all other XB1 games.

Ummm, no, 50% faster doesnt mean that it can get the game done faster. It means that its 50% more powerful. As a matter of fact. COD on PS4 is 125% higher res than the X1 ver. and BF4 is 56% higher res with a better framerate than the X1 ver. Thats over 50% right there. And Tomb Raiders being 60fps while 30fps on X1 is 100% more frames not to mention that the X1 version drops in res to 900p to keep its framerate. By the time MS and devs better utilize the eSRAM (which will always be a hinderance), the same devs and Sony will have better utilized the PS4’s architecture. You know, you MS fanboys are very delusional and ignorant of the way tech works. Not to mention gullible. You believe alot of nonsense. But i guess its what you have to do to make yourslef feel better about the X1. In the meanwhile, enjoy your 792p WD.