Guerrilla Games explained it before the game was released so Guerrilla Games never lied about it and they never false advertised it. You Xbox fan boys need to accept it.

Then why has Microsoft not been sued yet for lying about DRM, Kinect, Resolution on Xbox 360 game cases, their price drop, the cloud, false advertisement of The Witcher 3, among countless other lies?

GTFO you looney fraud!

It means Sony won, just like they should have. If Sony really did false advertise Killzone Shadowfall (which they didn’t) and admitted it (which they didn’t) then the court would have proceeded with the case (which they didn’t) and Sony would have been forced to compensate the plaintiff (which they didn’t).

It was obviously the guy who started the lawsuit who backed down because it wasn’t possible for him to win. Nobody buys a game based on 1080p resolution alone like this guy claimed he did, because resolution doesn’t make a game not blurry. His case was laughable.

There is no such thing as true “native” 1080p because games render different resolutions internally. Some games games have sub1080p textures and more, but they’re still considered “native” 1080p. Killzone Shadowfall does not use a scaler chip. It doesn’t matter if Guerrilla Games would have downscaled the textures, lowered polygons, or used temporal reprojection in order to hit 60 fps, it’s still “native” 1080p because they did not lower the resolution and upscaled it with a scaler chip. You guys at Gamingbolt are a joke, just like everyone else who thinks Killzone Shadowfall isn’t “native” 1080p. Technically, there is no such thing as “native” 1080p.

The guy suing Sony was obviously a liar and the court threw out the case with prejudice because the guy wanted compensation for damages that didn’t exist. Just because a game is “native” 1080p doesn’t mean it won’t look blurry. That is not how games work.

You guys lost and you can’t use this against Guerrilla Games any more.

So basically Sony admitted it and didn’t want to get found culpable.

Top
Frikken
Kek