You’re wrong on so many points.

Tons of casual gamers mean they won’t spend over $400 to upgrade their XBone just because the Scorpio is for “hardcore gamers”.

Many new games will take take advantage of PS4 Pro features and even the popular released games will have patches to upgrade them to Pro compatible.

PSVR has already sold out its pre-orders and many reviews have said the headset could be poised to take over consumer VR since the Oculus and Rift are so damn expensive and complicated to run.

Why do people keep beating on that argument as if there will never be console gamers anymore? It doesn’t matter you’ll aslways have console gamers just as much as you’ll have PC gamers. There are ton of casuals out there who will never come close to building a PC or risk over maintaining it.

Besides Scorpio is a premium product, they aren’t looking for mass production. It’s just for hardcore gamers until the price goes down a year or two after launch. So again Sony will have difficulty transitioning, I mean they won’t have ANY games at launch of PS4pro taking any advantage aside from VR which that in itself it’s just lame version of Oculus on PC.

UWP is actually killing the reason for Scorpio to exist. If the same games are available on PC and Scorpio, why bother with the latter when you can obviously get much more horsepower out of PC’s?

Oh the irony.

you dont know anything about hardware…lol

It’s less of a bottleneck to the game than the base PS4 version, no matter what self bottlenecks it incurs. It will still run the same game with a better performance or with more clear overhead than the base version.

Yes of course they did! IT’S STILL A 175GHz AMD CPU! Now, given that the version on consoles is given the caveats and cut corners to work on a weak GPU, shouldn’t a 33% increase in CPU power help remedy the the CPU issues with dropped frames? Additionally, shouldn’t a GPU that 2.2 times as powerful run the same image only with a 45% resource increase faster?

The people at Digital Foundry said they are excited to see the performance improvements in taxing games like the Battlefield series. Are you calling them liars? Tell you what, when the Neo comes out (are you denying that exists too?) and Digital Foundry does a comparison between the base version and the Neo version of several games, I would love to discuss the results with you. How does that sound?

Nobody said anything about dynamic scaling. Also, dynamic resolution scaling is more accurately thought of when the game takes longer than the allotted frame time to create a new frame, the image is scaled down to a lower resolution.

Yes it will decrease once dev’s start making neo/scorpio exclusives but then we will be close to the next iteration and so the cycle continues.

Both approaches are iterative, either can’t be more than the other. Point is who has the advantage? Just claiming coding for Neo and PS4 is a breeze means nothing, whereas Microsoft actually has a platform (Win10) as to WHY they can accomplish a “hardware ecosystem”. UWP isn’t exclusive to any hardware and can use the same code, API and developer’s engine across all devices.

Once you realize the approaches from either company you start to see why Microsoft took a significant leap ahead compared to Sony who took a very slight upgrade on the same architecture. This means Microsoft’s software support is so robust that Sony had to play it safe because creating a whole new hardware will mean developers sacrificing their base code and engine capabilities just to adapt like previous generations.

Yay…..