Comments on: Retrospective: The History of Assassin’s Creed — Part 1

By: hgretat

hgretat — Sun, 07 Oct 2012 13:21:00 +0000

In reply to Cole Sibley. Brotherhood and Revelations had pretty important plot points, so I don't think they were exactly fillers. Both are important to the series' story.

By: Jim

Jim — Sun, 07 Oct 2012 10:56:00 +0000

In reply to Cole Sibley. Well both brotherhood and revelations were literally fillers, as they were made while AC3 was being developed.

By: Cole Sibley

Cole Sibley — Fri, 05 Oct 2012 21:36:00 +0000

Ac1 was polarized-understandable but to me it was great. It was harder than the ezio games which is a plus and it made you feel like an assassin. ACB was the best to me since it had awsome sidmissions and fixed the poor combat in ac2. Plus multiplayer and recruit assassins were great. ACR was a good ending for ezio and Altair but was a stepdown since sidmissions sucked and it made the series feel out dated. Basically a filler game. Its a decent series but none of the games level up the GTAIV or Arkham city. Plus desmond is terrible good riddance when ac3 ends. Buts its not the last game just the last desmond game which isnt a huge loss.

By: Scarecrow

Scarecrow — Fri, 05 Oct 2012 16:19:00 +0000

Wow did they say it was like weed, that it made you crazy and kill people? Wow they couldn’t have used a more uneducated analogy.

By: Himanand Raj Bharat

Himanand Raj Bharat — Fri, 05 Oct 2012 14:41:00 +0000

pls do check your article before posting…you are contradicting your own words every next paragraph…but other then that nice work…