Comments on: Thief 4: 10 Ways It Can Better Its Pedigree

By: ToxicFox

ToxicFox — Sat, 09 Nov 2013 06:48:00 +0000

All Propaganda. all of it. except of the linear bit. Simply any game could use more of that.

By: Dissolution0fEternity

Dissolution0fEternity — Thu, 07 Nov 2013 09:35:00 +0000

T3, one of the greatest games I ever played. Im not happy about this new reboot, especially no factions and supernatural elements. Now people associate this game with Dishonored, come on!.

By: Alexander Anonymous

Alexander Anonymous — Mon, 15 Aug 2011 22:58:49 +0000

In reply to David. sucks that they said that theyre trying to make it an equivalent of an Assassin's creed game. Make it a Thief game! Thats why its called Thief! Not Thief's Creed!! lol.

By: Alexander Anonymous

Alexander Anonymous — Mon, 15 Aug 2011 22:55:29 +0000

I would have to strongly disagree with a few points in this article. Thief 4 should be only first person because that way its the most immersive and if you would have 3rd person, you would be able to see what Garrett can’t see which makes the experience feel fake. There should be undead enemies no matter how annoying they are but in the mentality of Thief 1 and 2. In those games, they were extremely both creeepy and frightening and the first person view point made it scarier since you would never know exactly where the undead were. I agree with everything else though.

By: No Hope

No Hope — Sat, 06 Aug 2011 21:10:04 +0000

One thing is 100% sure, Eidos Montreal will Screw it up big time.

The rumor mill has it that Consoles will be a platform for Thief 4 as well as multiplayer. That alone will destroy it. See, the suits at EM are forced to make a profitable game. A PC only platform with no MMORPG does not equate to $$$$.

A lot has changed since 1998, people.

This is one game I am not anxious about.

By: MainDroite

MainDroite — Fri, 05 Aug 2011 02:31:25 +0000

Thief 1 and 2 was about a dark atmosphere in a strange city. It was about cool cutscenes, cool monologues from Garrett, an awesome level disparity, being short on water arrows when you sorely needed them… all of this combined to make a great game.

Thief 3 was about ugly, cartoony cutscenes, failed implementation of good ideas (think of the Keeper Assassin… anyone else was particularly dissapointed by these guys?), useless mini-games and spending your WHOLE GODDAMN LOOT on equipment, which you wind up hoarding anyway because Garrett’s blackjack is a weapon of mass destruction. Except against those freaky undead guys in the asylum (which was my favourite level, by the way, so screw this idea of having no undeads).

By: Jeff

Jeff — Thu, 28 Jul 2011 23:40:43 +0000

I think the first the I played Thief 1 I was quite addicted. Thief 2 is cool also.
I never play thief 3 anymore because I can’t stand the stupid character voices
and, the transitions between areas! Lastly, 1st person IS THE ONLY WAY TO PLAY! I disagree with everything you say in this STUPID ARTICLE!!!

By: Enemig0

Enemig0 — Tue, 26 Jul 2011 19:16:04 +0000

I disagree with nearly everything in this stupid article. I’m glad that people like Jack, David, esme and Plox with friends did some decent commenting. I sure hope the devs of the fourth game do NOT reason the same way as the author of this horrible article!!!

By: Jim

Jim — Mon, 25 Jul 2011 20:41:13 +0000

I’m sorry, i disagree with nearly everything you say, I loved the first thief and even all the freaky undead things, also loved the dark creepy atmosphere, it should stay in first person as the 3rd person thing was a console compromise , also maybe in the future a mod will be available to test multiplayer it might work eventually who knows

By: Chuggs

Chuggs — Fri, 22 Jul 2011 10:52:05 +0000

double post