Metacritic decides to axe developer ratings

Posted By | On 31st, Mar. 2011

Metacritic had plans to begin assigning scores to developers, but these plans have since been cancelled.

According to Metacritic co-founder and games editor Marc Doyle, the firm has decided not to implement developer scores on the site because developer resumes are not as detailed as the site would like, and also because it believes the games industry doesn’t credit staff on projects the way it should. The site will still build a database of developers, but will not be assigning them ratings or scores.

Doyle said “we have no plans to bring [developer ratings] back. Right now we just want to see if we can build the database, take a shot at it, see what we can do.”

“If [developers] worked on 30 games and we can only show four and then we take on this score, which is really just an average of those games in our database for them, then that’s not fair. We discussed it as a team and it made sense to just drop that overall number whilst still trying to build this database which will be difficult, but we’re going to give it a shot. It’s needless to put that number on it though.”

Scores for individual developers have been live since last summer, but the addition was only recently noticed by developers. Some complained details regarding their development history was not included, or Metacritic didn’t cite specific releases.

“We’ve found it very tough in some cases to say who has been responsible for a game,” admitted Doyle. “I think that is an issue, of the industry not needing or not wanting to put that information out there. I don’t know exactly what’s behind that, I haven’t discussed that with too many publishers.”

“If by this issue coming about in the last week all of a sudden the publishers and developers are like: ‘Yes, let’s standardise this whole system’, and everyone wanted to go out there and in every game attach their credits, then we could hire someone to simply input that into our system. But… I don’t necessarily see that happening and I don’t think you see that happening.”

“That’s ultimately the goal of Metacritic: What should I watch, what should I play? Not necessarily to fuel some larger discussion over what person is more worthy than some other person.”

If it prevents people from incorrectly judging developers, then a lack of developer ratings can only be a good thing.

Thanks to VG247 for the info.


Tagged With:

Amazing Articles You Might Want To Check Out!

Keep On Reading!

30 New Games of 2025 with Amazing Graphics

30 New Games of 2025 with Amazing Graphics

If we remember 2025 for anything, it's offering some of the most stunning visuals in video games. Check out 30...

Marvel Rivals Will Add Marvel’s Spider-Man 2’s Advanced Suit 2.0 on January 30

Marvel Rivals Will Add Marvel’s Spider-Man 2’s Advanced Suit 2.0 on January 30

NetEase's hero shooter will add the suit to commemorate the PC release of Insomniac and Sony's open-world supe...

Donkey Kong Country Returns HD Trailer Hypes up Imminent Launch

Donkey Kong Country Returns HD Trailer Hypes up Imminent Launch

Retro Studios' classic platformer comes to the Nintendo Switch in remastered form on January 16, courtesy of F...

Sniper Elite: Resistance Trailer Showcases New Content, Gameplay Improvements, and More

Sniper Elite: Resistance Trailer Showcases New Content, Gameplay Improvements, and More

The next instalment in Rebellion's World War 2 stealth shooter franchise will launch for PC and consoles later...

Why Fans of Choice and Consequence Mechanics Should be Excited About Avowed

Why Fans of Choice and Consequence Mechanics Should be Excited About Avowed

Obsidian Entertainment's next RPG is making bold promises that should excite fans of the genre.

15 New Exciting Horror Games of 2025 and Beyond

15 New Exciting Horror Games of 2025 and Beyond

Horror fans still have plenty to look forward to.