Crysis 2 vs Battlefield Bad Company 2: 1080P HD Screenshot Comparison

Posted By | On 20th, Mar. 2011 Under Feature, Slider | Follow This Author @GamingBoltTweet


Page 1 of 4

Please use the back-next button to navigate through the image.

Indoors

Indoors


***The image below is from Battlefield Bad Company 2 and the one above is from Crysis 2.
So how does Crysis 2 stack up against Battlefield Bad Company 2. Check out these screens captured at 1080P.
Let us know your thoughts in the comments below.
 

Next Slide


Awesome Stuff that you might be interested in

  • Crysis 2 and Bad Company 2? Is this a joke? Worst. Comparison. Ever.

  • WTF MAN , can’t u get worst screenshots for BF3.

  • Outdoor environments look better on BF3, also the water effects because on crysis 2 it looks like the bullets hit metal rather than water.
    The Indoor part looks better on crysis 2 but maybe because of the design and more details added, as it should because you are in “futuristic” buildings.

    cheers from Portugal eheh

    • Just to let you know thats not BF3 it’s Battlefield Bad Company 2 and plus that Crysis 2 screenshot is it in the beta stage

    • Exactly what i was going to say… i would put money on it that those crysis 2 shots are from the xbox beta… you cant compare an xbox 360 beta with the ps3 finished version. ps3 crysis 2 will beat BF2… simple.

  • shastyxmcnasty

    While I am equally excited for both games I do believe that the crysis 2 environments looks better…they seem more crisp, however in picture 4 the water effects seem leaps and bounds better for Battlefield. On the plus side, Crysis and battlefield are released on opposite ends of the year
    … so I will be able to give ample time to both

    • shastyxmcnasty

      I am looking forward to the idea of waging war in modern day new york tho….it should be fun

  • tareq salah

    first 2 pictures, i give to crysis 2 but the last two to battlefield.

    but honestly screenshots dont do justice to games, i have to play them or watch a video.

    • jbg0623

      Gotta agree with you there the environments in the first two pics go to Crysis, it just looks amazing but those last two, specifically the 4th pic looks better. The ripples in the water are much more realistic in Battlefiels 3.

    • shastyxmcnasty

      completely agree with you guys…pics are fine when a game is first rumored and to just tease you a little bit…but for real comparisons you need hd videos…

    • jbg0623

      I’m actually ashamed I said this because when I said it I thought that was Battlefield 3, now that I know it’s 2 I feel sheepish because I’m not really a fan of 2. Personally I thought the graphics were crap.

  • jbg0623

    I’ve never really been a huge fan of battlefield, at least not in the way everyone else has. I like destructible environments but the graphics always made me feel like I was playing an updated version of counterstrike.

    • PrivatePyle

      You’ll be into it when Battlefield 3 comes out. I was the same way before I picked up BFBC2(cause I was getting full on CoD) and I’ve got a very solid feeling about the next entry in the franchise.

    • jbg0623

      O no I’ve seen the previews and I’m already sold on Battlefield 3. It’s just the previous 2 installments that weren’t all that great. Also seeing as how Medal of Honor was made by some of the same people I just didin’t like that either. This one however I have seen the previews for and it looks truly amazing. I think the graphics alone might out do COD but the gameplay is what I’m concerned about. When I knife someone in Medal of Honor it feels weak, like I’m just pushing a button. COD kinda makes it feel more fluid and violent. There’s emphasis on the knife kills but not so much that it stops the game like in Killzone 3. Don’t get me wrong, KZ3 has a good melle system that works for that game, but I kinda think those types of kills should but optional to perform if even capable at all.

    • shastyxmcnasty

      i understand what you mean jbg, I also feel like there are to many fps’s on the market now…and i find the best thing t do is to stick with a few franchises that you like and not to pick up new ones unless they do something amazing… because really, who has the time to immerse themselves into a new shooter every week…it just gets to be too much

  • PrivatePyle

    Yeah, it should’ve been BF3 vs. Crysis 2…BFBC2 has been out for at least a year now.
    Not to mention the complete difference in engines. BFBC2 has this choppy feeling to it, where you can see tons of white splinters throughout the map. Where Crysis 2 has this blurred effect that adds more to the illusion. Still greater graphics in Crysis 2 of course.

  • What the hell is this? The most idiotic comparison ever. So many things wrong with it.

    But FYI, Crysis 2 is the obvious winner, even if it might not look it in these awful screens.

  • PilarVIRUS

    They both look good, I was hoping for Killzone 3 vs Crysis 2.

  • Why aer u all saying BF3? when it is BF:BC2?

    • jbg0623

      my biggety bad dude, I read it wrong.

  • why r u saying BF3, when it says BF:BC2 ? …..

    • jbg0623

      I guess I read the title and saw Battlefield and just assumed they meant 3 without reading the rest of the title.

  • Pingback: World Spinner()

  • All of those crysis2 screenshots are from the xbox360 beta. You cannot compare an unfinished game to a finished one… especially with xbox screens. PS3 FTW!!!!

    • jbg0623

      Agreed, besides I like the graphics on the PS3 better than the 360, and yea you’re right now that I think about it; their game isn’t even finished yet is it?

  • sofabound00

    i agree, stupid comparison- and you can’t compare the two shots because the they’re completely different… crysis has a whole mess of crap and bad company is too clean

    @pilarVIRUS i think killzone would have been a better comparison too

    • PilarVIRUS

      Yeah… I want too see how the stack up against each other, it would be that or Uncharted 2.

  • doub7

    This is a really weird comparison since the games r drastically different in both graphical style & gameplay. & it would prolly b a lil more fair 2 compare crysis 2 to BF 3. Regardless they r both fantastic looking games & I luv both of them.

  • doub7

    Killzone 3 may very well b the bar 4 console graphics @ the moment. At least until uncharted 3 drops anyway.

    • PilarVIRUS

      This just makes me wonder, if a game that’s on 360 can compare to a game like Killzone. It’s basically the uses of the engine that makes a game look good.

  • doub7

    Well the word is Pilar that yes it can. I have heard from multiple places that the 360 is visually the best Crysis 2 & even bests the mighty Killzone in graphical fidelity.

    • PilarVIRUS

      I heard the same thing, Cryteh has mastered the uses of its engine.


 

Copyright © 2009-2017 GamingBolt.com. All Rights Reserved.