Project CARS PS4 Using EQAA, Car Detail Is Equivalent To High On PC, More Details On PC Version

The console versions are mostly at medium settings compared to the PC version, with some parameters ranging from medium to high.

Posted By | On 03rd, May. 2015 Under News | Follow This Author @GamingBoltTweet


Project-Cars-09

Slightly Mad Studios have revealed new information regarding the PS4 version of Project CARS and how it compares to the PC version. First of all, just like the Xbox One version, the PS4 version also uses EQAA for its anti-aliasing solution, shadow detail is between the medium to high equivalent PC setting.

PC medium shadow settings use 1024×4096 with 16 bit precision and PS4 is at the same resolution but with 32 bit shadow precision instead. The track and car detail in the PS4 version is equivalent to high on the PC but in the case of latter, the level of detail for shadows scales between high and medium.

The developer also revealed that the game uses light pre-pass renderer. “There are actually two EQAA resolves, one before Motion-Blur (which is executed in HDR) and one before tone-mapping / bloom composition. On PC with motion-blur turned off, each sample of the MSAA target is tone-mapped individually – however since console always has MB enabled per sample tone-mapping is switched off.”

The developer also released the following numbers regarding shadow details in the PC version.

PC Low – 512×2048, 16bit, 2 spot shadows
PC Medium – 1024×4096, 16bit, 2 spot shadows
Console -1024×4096, 32bit, 4 spot shadows
PC High – 1408×5632, 32bit, 4 spot shadows
PC Ultra – 2048×8192, 32bit , 4 spot shadows + enables shadows in Environment Maps

The PS4 and Xbox One versions are mostly run on medium settings compared to the PC version with some parameters varying between medium and high.

On a related note, GamingBolt’s technical analysis across all 3 versions will go live next week.

Source: Neogaf 1, 2, 3


Awesome Stuff that you might be interested in

  • Psionicinversion

    Hahaha medium settings, another disappointing console port. Nevermind eh

    • d0x360

      The article also leaves out the fact that on pc there is not only low medium and high but also very high and ultra. Also on pc they neglect to mention resolution, much higher levels of AA and a stable frame rate.

      Games gonna be terrible regardless but its still important to mention. Saying a console version compares to pc on medium to high means little when someone on pc is running it on ultra at 4k or ultra with 3 monitor surround.

    • Psionicinversion

      Yeah hahaha. So consoles are mainly running on the 2nd lowest setting haha. Pathetic

    • ImOnaDrugCalledSheen

      Not nearly as pathetic as your life though.

    • Socius

      You’re resorted to responding to “pathetic” people online. Your life is even worse than his. You win at interwebs, console peasant.

    • You Are Flat Out Wrong

      Pathetic is damage controlling for Sony for free all day like you do, loser.

      But then you need to fill out that time while Bloodborne is loading :^)

    • Guest

      Yeah and? Most PC will probably run this at even lower settings,….pathetic! Most people have cheap underpowered laptops.

    • Psionicinversion

      not the people that play these type of games wont hahahah

    • Johnny Penso

      Have either of you two geniuses seen first hand what the game looks like on medium? I didn’t think so.

    • d0x360

      Someone missed the point! Doesn’t matter if it looks amazing on medium (it doesn’t, I have) because this article is trying to compare it to the pc version. Had the article left the comparison out the comment wouldn’t exist but seeing as how the main focus of the article is comparing it to PC and both of our comments are doing the same the only off topic comment here is yours. Good job!

    • Guest

      And the PC version better be doing something with all that extra power. Its to bad it all adds up to just a little bit better looking.

    • Guest

      Whats your point? Because it sounds stupid. And what do you think that everybody who has a PC has a PC that can run this game at ultra settings, with 4K res and has 3 monitors? None the less 3 4K monitors? I think you pro PC guys (and I know you’re really just a MS fanboy) have all gone delusional, thinking every PC can do 4K ultra settings on 4K monitors with rock solid stable fps. When in reality its nothing like that.

    • demonsouls13

      well said.I tested Project cars with 2 different pc:s Pc number 1.i7 4790k 980sli ultra 4k even with that pc it could not hold stable 60 fps.Then i tested pc number 2.Fx8320 overclocked to 4.4 gtx780 ultra 1080p,when i turned thunderstorm on fps dropped from 60 to 20:).Got to say much more relaxing to play with Ps4.Ps4 400 dollars its real masterpiece,i know only Pc users will hate me after this but the truth is,if you build Pc with 400 dollars you only get web browser and thats a real fact!
      I think Project cars is excelent game but even with 4k ultra it does look like little better version Ps3 Granturismo 6,Driveclub looks much better but i dont like too much Arcade racers.You guys Should look Dirt Rally early acces in 4k maxed out Acropolish stages they look almost Photo realistic very impressive!

    • You Are Flat Out Wrong

      A “Supercharged PC” they said. What a crock. There’s PS1 level character modeling in the PS4 version close by on the track and a paper crowd. It’s that underpowered. Cerny is a Hack.

      This is getting even more pathetic and sad all the time. And all Sony shills do is babble “B-B-BUH XBONE” (Your console still sucks as does the xbone) and cry all day. Losers.

      http://i.imgur.com/mXC4Pdj.jpg

      http://i.imgur.com/OAZ3xIU.jpg

    • Tha Truth

      And the uneducated vermin scum on the PC stick their heads up their own arses over resolution because it’s the only thing they have to do with their worthless, uneducated, unemployed lives.

      How was that 18 month wait for GTA V to finally come to your worthless, dead, peasant platform? Do you enjoy being treated like the non – gaming peasant garbage you truly are when REAL gamers on the consoles got the game in 2013? LMAO, PATHETIC. Shilling an inferior version of a game that took 1.5 years to come to your worthless, weak, peasant platform because the developers quite rightly prioritized getting the game to human beings first and making the uneducated scum on the PC wait like the starving vermin they are. PATHETIC.

    • You Are Flat Out Wrong

      Funny, almost your entire post history is about how resolution matters on the PS4. Yet when the PC demonstrates the complete obsolescence of the PS4. Suddenly “resolution doesn’t matter”. Something the matter, Shill Bradley?

      50% more powerful than something with zero power is still zero power, loser :^)

    • Guest

      Ha ha ha, you are so funny that I laugh at you.

    • Amith Thomas

      @disqus_gv29h2n4rE:disqus

      Ah, the retad strikes again. You must be trolling. I have no other explanation.

    • Guest

      How you gonna call him a retad with a name like Amith Thomas?

    • Psionicinversion

      Back in 2013 when gaming youtubers couldn’t play it because it was crap, then tried the ps4 version and still couldn’t play out because it was still crap then got on pc at glorious 60fps and max details and they all say yes this is the version gta5 was supposed to be

    • You Are Flat Out Wrong

      Funny how the PC version now has a higher metacritic than the console versions with better reviews due to how good the port is. I wonder what position Sony shills will take now. Will it be “Metacritic doesn’t count” like with The Odor 800P. Or “Metacritic always is right” like with Bloodborne but the tacit admission PC got the best version of GTA V that was worth the wait :^)

    • Psionicinversion

      yep exactly

    • rudero

      There is no way you are mature enough to afford a good PC. Got your parents to thank for it? Child

    • ThePokeMaster

      Your comments don’t sound all that mature in the first place.

      When the majority of PC gamers have PCs capable of playing every game at Ultra or Very-high, then you can talk. But for now, too many PC gamers are playing on Medium at best.

    • Guest

      And your obsessions continue. I see you are still obsessing over the PS4 and making your thousands and thousands of accounts to smear it. Why would you care that the PC ver is superior? It should be, otherwise what good is all that extra power for? And I don’t see any Sony or MS fanboys even remotely saying or thinking that their systems are as good or better than a PC. Its just you MS fanboys doing this to try and bash the PS4 over the head with. Its sad and pathetic that this is what you have to resort to. And you cant be an adult. You are way to immature.

    • You Are Flat Out Wrong

      The truth hurts doesn’t it. Immediately screaming “B-B-BUH MS FANBOY”. LOL, not even close.

      I demonstrated the complete and utter uselessness of the PS4 yet again. PC is the superior platform. And all you can do is cry and stammer and accuse

      By the way, Linux called. It’s taking over. The real revolution is at hand :^)

    • Amith Thomas

      Linux and gaming xD
      Linux and anything besides programming related stuff, for that matter

      After some time maybe…

    • Guest

      Wow, the difference between the PC version and the PS4 version is so minuscule. You people have all become pathetic thinking these small differences are somehow big. You pay all that extra money for all that extra power and this is all you get for it? Can somebody point out the differences to me cuz I cant see them. Wow! people are getting pettier and pettier.

    • You Are Flat Out Wrong

      Peasant eyes can’t see the bad draw distance. Paper cut out crowds, worse AA coverage, worse shadows and reduced track geometry in the PS4 version compared to PC High.

      No wonder they can’t see past 30FPS

    • ThePokeMaster

      “32bit, 4 spot shadows” is not medium settings.

      And even if it was medium, you’re pretending like “medium” is bad.
      When the majority of PC gamers have PCs capable of playing every game at Ultra or Very-high, THEN you guys can talk. But for now, too many PC gamers are playing on Medium at best.

    • Psionicinversion

      Wow 1 setting haha. From what I hear a 770 can do ultra on it which means millions of gamers can do it no problem

    • ThePokeMaster

      “Wow 1 setting haha”
      What point are you trying to make? People have been playing on consoles for 3 decades now. What makes you think they’re gonna start caring now?

      ” a 770 can do ultra…which means millions of gamers can”
      They could, but that’s not the reality.

    • Psionicinversion

      Why isn’t it a reality, NVIDIA sold millions of 970/980s and that’s a GPU released late last year, so yes millions can.

    • ThePokeMaster

      All I’m saying it’s that they’re not in the majority of PC gamers. The ultra/max graphics settings that PC fanboys like to brag about to console gamers whenever a new trailer or screenshot comes out, is not achievable by a big chunk of PC gamers themselves.

    • Psionicinversion

      Actually it’s not that hard to do it at 1080p, most of the more hard-core gamers are running 1440p/4K.

      It’s hard to say how many people are the AAA gamers because sure there’s 125mill steam accounts but when you look at sales of games on pc it’s very low in comparison. A game like GTA5 can give a good idea because most people like it, always a top seller and games like battlefield and COD can give a good idea to as to how many gamers there actually are. 970 is actually quite a good deal which is why that was a good time for alot of people to upgrade. Is small compared to console gamers bit there’s more people than you think that can run it that high

    • Socius

      A $150 video card can easily out-perform the quality/frame rate settings on consoles.

    • ThePokeMaster

      That doesn’t exactly refute my statement. Thanks for info I already knew about.

      Anyway, $150 for a video card alone? sure. But you’re comparing with a console that includes everything.

    • Socius

      There are sub-$400 PC builds that outperform the consoles. Look up the potato masher for example. $350 and 2x the frame rate of consoles and higher quality/resolution too. Consoles became pointless outside of exclusives as soon as they started to switch to PC hardware.

    • HAppY_KrAToS

      Hahaha lol
      About 2.5% of PC gamers, according to steam and valve stats, have powerful pcs and fast-high resolution monitors, to be able to play games at ultra.

      Congratulations, PC gamer @ultra number #647
      PS. 100% of xbox 1 and ps4 gamers will play the same game, with the same great visuals, that run only on a little 1.6GHz cpu. Can you just imagine if the ps4 had a 4ghz cpu and a titan card? The game would run 3 levels above ultra: extreme insane mode.

    • Psionicinversion

      2.5% lmao yeah whatever seeing as it says a 970 has 2.8% so you lie yet again.

      Lets have a proper look…

      970 2.81%
      770 2.22%
      780 0.99%
      980 0.77%
      780Ti 0.47%
      R9 200 series 0.94% that include 290/290x

      Total = 8.2% able to run ultra…. please dont cry because your wrong.

      GPU’s that arent listed are Titan, Titan Black, Titan X, Titan Z but few people will have them anyway and it also doesnt include those people using sli/xfire which quite alot of gamers do use.

      The same great visuals lol high textures medium settings and shadow level 2.5 because its half way between medium and high.

      4Ghz CPU and a Titan lol yeah all you can do is imagine. You wouldnt have such a little box with them running. Heck your PS4 CPU runs at 1.6Ghz (rated at 2.75Ghz max) and your GPU is underclocked to 800mhz (usually clocked at 1+Ghz on PC). Also your box would be no where near $400 and seeing as about 10 people would pay $1000+ for a console, never going happen

    • You Are Flat Out Wrong

      Slightly Mad Reckon a 280X, 290 and 290X will run ultra as well once they lock down the optimizations for Day 1. The game was supposed to support Mantle till AMD killed it and recommended DX12 or Vulkan. SMS hinted they will be making a big update to support both API by the end of the year on the WMD forums so it’s likely both will also get a performance boost.

      Though I can’t wait for the booty blasting once Digital Foundry’s £300 i3/750Ti PC runs it better at 1080/60FPS than a PS4. Again.

    • Psionicinversion

      Yeah was thinking 280x but wasn’t 100% sure, I’ve got a280x until AMD hurry up and drop the 300 series on us. nice if they update to dx12 it’ll run ultra on a 750Ti probably either way it will make the consoles look more of a joke already

    • You Are Flat Out Wrong

      People with the retail version minus the day 1 patch (As they backed the game) say it does pretty well even on AMD as it has good multicore scaling and hyperthreading support and even an R270/8350 combo will get you very high 1080/60 on most settings. But CPU is the current bottleneck in performance.

      But then I’m personally waiting for AMD as well. I’m rocking team red now. And since there will be support for dual GPU’s from different family ranges at least in DX12 and Vulkan (Though same manufacturers. LOL if you think Nvidia would agree to Crossfire with AMD), a 200 and a 300 should do quite nicely indeed. Shame AMD have that same aversion to the number 3 Valve seem to have.

    • Psionicinversion

      NVIDIA has got it blocked out already since that lucid virtu stuff happened anyway and since the drivers since the 400 series got introduced. That blocked out physx if an AMD gpu is detected in the system.

      The thing I’m not sure about with Zen is the thing called coherent fabric, not sure if its just for APUs or to link with a dedicated gpu for system wide HSA. Think I saw the 32core (server chip) which doesn’t include integrated graphics links to dGPUs through that so no reason why it can’t work for desktops. That would be awesome.

      I wouldn’t say no to an 8 core Zen with 16GB stacked HBM linking to the Greenland GPUs for full HSA :d

    • HAppY_KrAToS

      You’re like a Jehovah witness :people will tell them they’re absolutely happy with their current religion, their beliefs and their God, but the witness will try hard, will come home 10 times, etc, and will do all he can to convince people they should rather pick the jehovah religion, because it is better, because it is good and because it is the right choice.

      You can’t accept that a little weak cpu-gpu in around 350$ now, can produce games that play and look as good as hundreds millions computers, just without the extra anti aliasing +some other graphic options that the ultra settings can give on PC.
      You can’t accept that a studio can do 95% of the graphics job on a little 400mb of ram (ps3 ) where the same PC version would easily eat up 4 or 5 gb for the same job.

      Tell me, how many % of pcs are playing on a fast 700-1000$ monitor that supports 1440p, let alone 4k?

      Let’s do a deal, genius.
      I will make a photo of my ps3, ps4, vita games, and will post it here.
      And you, you will make a photo of your original PC boxes + a screen capture of your games list on steam, valve, etc.

      Also, Show the community your PC, with a nice photo of your pic rig, so we all can see what a true PC gamer is, with all its original games, etc.
      Show us, OK?

      And if we don’t post our pics, we will never post a comment again, on gaming bolt. OK?

      People are waiting for your pics, now.and so am I.

    • Psionicinversion

      700-1000 hahaha only professional grade monitors cost that much idiot. In fact that would be cheap for that. I havnt games like you I put in 11 years pretty much solely on MMOs so got nothing to show box wise for that before that mainly command and conquer, battle zone half life counter strike(I played that for years to) wing commander prophecy, after it not played to much of anything because games got boring, same recycled crap every year.

      Waiting on star citizen to get back into MMO style games, tried FF14 exactly the same as wow, rift etc just with different setting so bored the crap out of me. Not alot worth looking forward to in gaming. Just witcher 3, star citizen mass effect 4 until dawn that’s it really off top of my head

    • HAppY_KrAToS

      idiot,
      not everybody has black friday days, or buy things with dollars(or rather empty credit cards), also, you get up to 25% of vat in tons of countries…
      and besides of that, if you pick a nice 27″ 1440p ips monitor, get ready to pay some good cash… unless you buy cheap noname korean monitors on ebay…
      a professional monitor, like a nec, eizo, etc, costs much more than 1000$. you can 2x it..

    • Psionicinversion

      You only need professional monitors for… Professional work fool. I havnt seen many IPS panels around. there mainly TN 1ms, fastest IPS I’ve seen is 4 or 5ms although colour is supposed to be better. I live in UK so I have 20% added to everything and decent 1440p 1 ms monitor is about £350 so suck on that. Here’s some monitors for you

      http://www.overclockers.co.uk/productlist.php?groupid=17&catid=1120

    • Guest

      Hahahaha, paying WAY more money for just slightly better graphics, why don’t you pick out these big differences, fanboy, ahahahaha, another disappointing PC shill. Ahahahahaha

    • Psionicinversion

      alot better graphics actually, only blind console fanboys refuse to believe theres a big difference as there world comes crashing down that theyve paid for an expensive paper weight

  • JuniorSophitia

    We can all discuss the different PC settings such as very High, and Ultra, but those setting even at 1080p will cause challenges for many PC owners. I have an SLI rig with two Nvidia GT760s and at 1080p(very high/Ultra setting) I’m in single digit frame rates on certain tracks. On others if I’m lucky I can average 16-22 fps, a far cry from the 1080px60fps that I was hoping for. Obviously turning down the details to medium/high(like the consoles) should enable much better frame-rates, but that’s not what I expect to be forced to do on a PC where I’ve played £300+ for just the GPUs. Hopefully, the final build should give more performance, but I don’t think we should be too harsh on the consoles. I’ve played a demo of this on consoles(PS4) at a Game store, and it looks good, and more importantly runs at 60 fps.

    • Amith Thomas

      well, 760 is not a powerful card.

      Always atleast go for the *70gtx version or higher. Sure it’s a little more expensive, but it pays off.

      Second, maybe SLI support just isn’t good with this game yet.

      What framerates do you get with other games though ?

    • JuniorSophitia

      I’m afraid we all can’t upgrade whenever we feel the need to. I actually had a Radeon 7970 with 3GB VRAM and the pcars performance was even worse, granted this was the pre release builds as I am a member. But I now have a near final/final build and the performance is no better. If you check the WMD forums you will see that pcars heavily favours Nvidia cards, the fps difference can be significant. Check some YT vids to see for yourself. I ended up investing in Nvidia cards in the hope my fps would improve, which it has but still not where it should be. Sli support is half decent but not the best. Other racers I do get 60fps for the most part, with occasional screen tearing of dropped frames, but effectively 60fps in Asetto Corsa/iRacing dependant on the no. of cars on track which is around 8 on AC and 12-16 on iRacing. I think it’s a little unfair to compare even 2 racing games as the visuals on PCars are far more advanced than either AC or iRacing so the fps should be higher.

    • Psionicinversion

      2x 760’s… are you using an sli profile? an official one willbe released when the game goes live so you should get much higher performance

    • JuniorSophitia

      Yes I’m using an sli profile as recommended by the WMD forums. Whilst I’m looking forward to an official SLI profile for pCars, I’m not holding my breath for suddenly getting to a locked 60fps@1080p on Very High/Ultra. After all I think it unreasonable to go from low 20fps to 60fps, all else being equal. Which brings me to my original point about the performance SMS has been able to extract out of the PS4(1080px60fps@Meduim/High), and with the XB1(handicapped by having to use good old DX11.x) running at 900px60fps at Medium/high settings). Both using EQAAx16 for their AA solution which is equivalent of 4xMASA on PC.

    • Psionicinversion

      tbh the settings the consoles are using will easily be beaten by a cheap card no problem. Your GPU’s shouldnt be performing that badly. What CPU have you got seeing as someone else said the CPU is a bottleneck?

    • JuniorSophitia

      I’m am aware my CPU is very old, and can be a bottle neck as with AC I get a warning regarding 100% CPU occupancy with a full grid, but the frame-rate is still in the 50-60fps. I really do need to upgrade, but since the platform i’m running on is also outdated I would need to change more than just my CPU. All other PC games have been running good (circa 30/60fps plus) depending on game of course, but an Intel Q6600 over-clocked to 3.2Ghz can struggle with the latest forward looking games like pCars. It’s the first game to really give me issues, hence my thoughts on poor SLI optimisations.

    • Psionicinversion

      just wait till its released get the day 1 patch and the proper nvidia drivers then see what its like

    • JuniorSophitia

      That’s exactly my plan.

    • Amith Thomas

      Maybe it’s badly optimized then. I don’t know though, maybe just turn down some settings ? the grass setting for example – that’s supposed to be really heavy. From what I know there is a significant difference between high and ultra, so turn down a few settings and you should be good.

      Yeah, sli support is a problem, just like crossfire… dual card setups always have these issues. Hope SMS resolve these problems.

      Recently I’ve only heard that it runs better and better. I don’t have the game though, so what you have to say has infinitely more value than mine.

    • JuniorSophitia

      I’ve already tried some of your suggestions of turning down settings and if I do turn things down, then frankly it starts to look a bit ropey. I think my expectations were perhaps a little unrealistic for the PC setup I have. Really this game needs to be experience at it full potential, otherwise for me there is less of an incentive to invest into it, as both iRacing/Asetta Corsa in my view have better physics/handling models and better steering wheel support. That could all change as I’m sure SMS will continue to improve the product post launch.

    • Amith Thomas

      Fair enough. Hopefully some of it gets sorted out, maybe with an official SLI profile or something.
      I think we often forget how important it is for games to run great too.

    • Thad Vanity

      There is no official SLI profile yet. I’d wager your using only a single card right now. You could set the Program Profile to force AFR1/2. You’ll likely see some improvements there. Or set one card to do only Anti-Aliasing.

      Once the nVidia Profile is made available though, you will see your frames essentially double for the most part.

    • JuniorSophitia

      Well I’m hoping your right. But the unofficial SLI profile does show the Nvidia green bar to the left of the screen working. I also tried switching the PhysX support from CPU to the 2nd GPU, with very little jump in fps. So as it stands I’m still under the impression the SLI support is seriously gimped.

  • XDrone (is the new name)-lol

    What all these pc elitist forget to tell everybody, to get those settings on high or ultra high you have to dump $1K on their so-called superior system.

    You guys make me laugh every time you try to pass off console gamers. But we just sit back and enjoy all the games that we get to play….Bloodborne anybody 😉

    • You Are Flat Out Wrong

      Wrong.
      http://www.reddit.com/r/PCMasterRace/wiki/builds

      All console shills have are lies, lies and framerate drops :^)

    • Tha Truth

      And now the hypocrite speaks! Everybody saw all those petitions that the peasant garbage on the PC made when they were crying their eyes out and BEGGING From Software to make a PC version of Bloodborne. What’s the matter, troll? Just because you and 10,000 no – lifers on the trashy dead, peasant PC platform didn’t get the game you were crying over now you’re going to try and bash it out of pitiful, pathetic jealousy? What a sad loser you are.

      I can’t blame you for all those petitions, it’s understandable that you and the other peasants are bored to tears with the worthless, obsolete, low – quality trash that passes for “PC gaming” so I can understand how you would get your hopes up over the thought of finally getting a game that was WORTH playing. But to try and criticize the very game you were BEGGING for just a few weeks ago only furthers the proof that the PC peasant race are the most ignorant, uneducated, unwashed, hypocritical douchebag losers that this planet has ever had the misfortune of producing.

    • Amith Thomas

      @disqus_gv29h2n4rE:disqus Are you trolling ? Or maybe just retarded ?

      “low – quality trash that passes for “PC gaming” so I can understand how you would get your hopes up over the thought of finally getting a game that was WORTH playing”

      ok, I think ‘ignorant’ is a better term.

      @xdroneisthenewnamelol:disqus
      Are you retarded too ? Why bring up PC Master race here ? As if it’s some serious war or something.
      “But we just sit back and enjoy all the games that we get to play….”
      Well, we do too, just a lot of the time we sit back and enjoy a much, much better experience.

      Sure, you get exclusives like Bloodbourne, and that’s great !

      See that’s one of the pros of getting a console – high quality exclusives, just like the PC has pros as well.

    • Guest

      Stop being so defensive. It makes you look insecure.

    • Amith Thomas

      Wow, you serious ? You also trolling ?

      People starting these retarded fights for no reason whatsoever. It’s not like anyone said anything. Just out of the blue “PC elitist douchebags this, that, enjoy your poor games bla bla bla”

      Oh well, some people are trolls, others retarded. Moving along.

    • Leftoverlunch
    • Thad Vanity

      Man you talk some garbage don’t you…..

      What’s 10,000 people out of the largest gaming platform/community in the world?

      Jack.Shit.

    • You Are Flat Out Wrong

      And yet every single game is better on PC and all you can stammer out is “B-B-BLOODBORNE”

      And we’ll have it when Sony goes bankrupt and has to sell off assets, anyway. At 60FPS, no less (An adult framerate)

      Remember, 50% more than zero power is still zero :^)

    • Jim Peterson

      Grow up.

    • Jecht_Sin

      Still better than signing petitions to raise the frame rate from 0fps on the “PC version” isn’t it? :p

    • Guest

      You realize that I can conjure up a bunch of PC game pics where the game is dropping to 16 fps. I bet you Bloodbourne would take a higher spec PC to run it and would still drop to 16.

    • AndrewLB

      Your PS4 actually costs $700 when you factor in 6 years of having to pay for online gaming.

      Combine that with the fact that a $350 super-budget PC beats out the PS4… and all you have left are empty words, self loating, and an abundance of ignorance.

      https://youtu.be/DH6FCgqQB_s

    • Jecht_Sin

      Don’t forget the cheaters throwing money bags on people faces in GTA V online. I hear that and other cheats are totally ruining the online experience on PC…

    • Psionicinversion

      yeah them few people are really ruining it for millions hahahah get a life dude

    • Psionicinversion

      Bout $600-700 actually, unlucky

    • Gunther Fenz

      Actually we’re the one laughing about the fact how you ignore that every console owner also owns a PC, either a desktop or laptop and sorry to bring you the bad news, but an average PC + console is still more expensive than our gaming PC.

      So not only do you have a inferior gaming system, you also have an inferior PC, plus you paid more money. Too funny! hehehe

  • Broseph Stanley

    I’ve been debating on grabbing it on my pc, or ps4, or most likely, both. My pc most likely will run high, 1080p, going based on my assetto corsa settings, but my friends and my recliner/70″/7.1 surround sound sit in my man cave. I’ve never been satisfied pc gaming on my TV, so usually if a game is on console I just enjoy my recliner. Il be doing the same with the witcher, thanks to my free copy from the gtx 960ftw a month or so back. Which off track, is a pretty darn capable card I’ve been thoroughly impressed. It will at least get me by till next year when it’s my actual gpus turn for an upgrade. Every year I set aside a component to focus on, this year was processor/mobo, but my power supply went nuts and killed my Gpu. So instead of getting a 8350 and sabertooth board, I went with a 6300, msi gaming, and the 960 along with a new 800watt psu.

  • ImOnaDrugCalledSheen

    This just in PC is capable of better graphics then console, I know I know really surprising stuff here, with yet another one of these articles now the PC elitists can start their self pleasuring circle jerk again.

    • Amith Thomas

      There’s nothing wrong with this article. It gives us some really insightful details. You’re not okay with the resolution comparison articles between xbox and ps4 then ? What about all the PS4 circle jerking there ?

      This article actually has some good information in it, instead of resolution gate. The PC circle jerking is unrelated. This article has just about as much as any other.

  • Joker121

    Jeez the ranting never stops. People who prefer PC’s will buy the pc version and those who prefer consoles will buy the console version. It’s as simple as that.

    • Beat

      It’s not about that. It’s about spewing corporate non-sense aobut being equal OR better for 400$…

  • omarcominyo

    I should think so too!! Comparing what I paid for my PC to what I paid for my PS4 if they were nearly identical I’d have been annoyed! Doesn’t mean the console version is laughably bad though like certain pc fanboys like to think! The only thing laughable is their stupidity!!

  • Thad Vanity

    This is how all Developers need to approach PC vs Console comparisons.

    Unambiguous facts and details.

    • Amith Thomas

      yep. Love the details


 

Copyright © 2009-2017 GamingBolt.com. All Rights Reserved.