As If The Star Wars Battlefront 2 Lootboxes Controversy Wasn’t Enough, EA Has Now Messed Up UFC 3 As Well

EA issues a statement.

Posted By | On 03rd, Dec. 2017

ea sports ufc 3

EA has been in the news a lot lately, and for all the wrong reasons. The controversy surrounding the loot crates and microtransactions model in Star Wars: Battlefront II has sparked serious debates and criticisms over the company’s market policies, and as if that hasn’t been enough, we now have something similar and entirely new on our hands.

The upcoming EA Sports developed UFC 3 is currently in beta, and the fact that it features a loot crates model similar to the one in Battlefront II has caught the attention of a whole lot of people. People have, of course, been reacting angrily, leading EA to release a statement in response.

In the statement, EA assured people that the loot crates model is only present in the Ultimate Team mode, and doesn’t affect any other area of the game, while also assuring that they will continue to make tweaks and improvements until the game’s final launch.

“There are no purchasable fighter upgrades that affect any other mode,” EA said in its statement to IGN. “Our matchmaking logic takes fighter attributes, moves, boosts, and perks into account and prioritizes matching players with similarly upgraded fighters in addition to player skill. The goal is to prevent uneven matchups as much as possible. Furthermore, the game features Online Ranked Championships and unranked Online Quick Match for competitive and casual head-to-head online play.”

“The beta is very helpful in tuning all aspects of our game, including Ultimate Team,” the statement continues. “We welcome constructive feedback, and thank everyone playing the beta for providing us with vital information to make the game as fun and engaging as possible for our fans.”

It’s also worth noting, incidentally, that UFC games have featured such microtransactions in the past as well, though maybe people are only noticing them more now due to the whole Battlefront II fiasco. Either way, it’s a good thing, ultimately, that such tolerance for such practices continues to lessen. Hopefully something good will actually come out of this entire controversy.

Stay tuned to GamingBolt for more updates.

Thanks, Twinfinite!


Amazing Articles You Might Want To Check Out!

Keep On Reading!

Split Fiction Review – Split Quality

Split Fiction Review – Split Quality

Split Fiction is another good co-op adventure from the award-winning Hazelight Studios. The story and characte...

Astro Bot Rescue Mission’s Success Was a Surpise for the Development Team – Game Director

Astro Bot Rescue Mission’s Success Was a Surpise for the Development Team – Game Director

The team behind PSVR title Astro Bot Rescue Mission was having a great time as it experimented with the medium...

Classic Game Publisher Acclaim Has Been Revived

Classic Game Publisher Acclaim Has Been Revived

Acclaim is coming back with a focus on publishing indie titles by new developers and with the hopes of revivin...

Assassin’s Creed Shadows’ Red Bull Collaboration Items Offer Minor Buffs For Both Protagonists

Assassin’s Creed Shadows’ Red Bull Collaboration Items Offer Minor Buffs For Both Protagonists

Assassin's Creed Shadows players can take part in a simple quiz that rewards them with a trinket for each of t...

33 Immortals, Enter the Gungeon, Mullet Madjack, and More Coming to Game Pass in March

33 Immortals, Enter the Gungeon, Mullet Madjack, and More Coming to Game Pass in March

Rogue-lite deck-builder Monster Train is available now, while space-faring hospital management sim Galacticare...

Once Human is Getting Permanent Scenario Servers, Cross-Character Asset Sharing Later This Month

Once Human is Getting Permanent Scenario Servers, Cross-Character Asset Sharing Later This Month

The new features are being released over the coming month, and will bring a host of quality-of-life changes to...