Xbox 360 slim already under production?

When Sony announced the PlayStation 3 Slim last year, it created a craze around the internet. But has Microsoft now cottoned onto the idea too? According to Kotaku, a new image of Xbox 360′s motherboard has surfaced. Take a look below:

The image above (possibly, nothing is concrete yet) shows the motherboard of an Xbox 360 slim. But the catch here is that it’s the new chip design for the rumoured Xbox 360 slim, which is undergoing testing in China. This new design combines the GPU and the CPU together which makes it small. Its not a little modification- it’s a total redesign of the system.

Also with Project Natal due this year, it might actually be a good idea to launch the slim version along with it. However we would advise that you take this with a grain of salt.

Many thanks to Kotaku & A9VG.

Tagged with: ,

  • Subscribe to me on YouTube
submit to reddit

    18 Comments

  1. cj | March 17, 2010 06:09 pm

    not first

    1. Joe | March 17, 2010 07:12 pm

      First

    2. Jimbo | March 17, 2010 07:56 pm

      Oh yes you are

  2. === popurls.com === popular today | March 17, 2010 06:20 pm

    === popurls.com === popular today…

    yeah! this story has entered the popular today section on popurls.com…

  3. TJ | March 17, 2010 06:23 pm

    Can you say… desktop hibachi? FLAME ON!

  4. Limpdo | March 17, 2010 06:28 pm

    Wow, what a great idea. I like it.

    jess
    http://www.anon-vpn.net.tc

  5. Chris | March 17, 2010 06:43 pm

    Don’t the big Xbox 360s have a hard enough time keeping cool already. All I can say about an 360 slim is – “RED RINGS”

    1. noyb | March 17, 2010 11:03 pm

      Nah, one thing with M$, as badly as they screw up, they do learn from their mistakes. Then make other big mistakes :)

  6. uberVU - social comments | March 17, 2010 08:57 pm

    Social comments and analytics for this post…

    This post was mentioned on Twitter by GamingBoltTweet: GamingBolt: Xbox 360 slim already under production? (http://cli.gs/hD1zM) http://cli.gs/hD1zM

  7. Xbox 360 slim already under production? | WeCharts.com | March 17, 2010 09:04 pm

    [...] Here is the original post: Xbox 360 slim already under production? [...]

  8. bunny | March 17, 2010 10:59 pm

    Microsoft were integral in the killing off of this idea in 1994. Their overwhelming FUD campaign against the Amiga platform killed off the same design… CPU and chipset (graphics chip, sound chip, display chip) on the same die to reduce size, power consumption and heat. It would have seen the light of day four months after Commodore finally went under.

    And one of the two main Microsoft Mantras? The Amiga is only a games machine…. IRONY considering that Xbox and DirectX… Microsoft coveted the gaming title all along.

  9. Richard | March 18, 2010 03:36 am

    nah No RED RINGS, I mean c’mon even laptops are being rolled out with heck of a lot more CPU/GPU power than XBOX 360.

  10. Xbox 360 slim already under production? - frank007's posterous | March 18, 2010 01:08 pm

    [...] Apparently a Xbox 360 slim version might be under works.Source:http://gamingbolt.com/2010/03/17/xbox-360-slim-already-under-production/ [...]

  11. 007denison - Xbox 360 slim already under production? | March 18, 2010 05:24 pm

    [...] 18th, 13:24 Apparently a Xbox 360 slim version might be under works.Source:http://gamingbolt.com/2010/03/17/xbox-360-slim-already-under-production/ ( Leave a comment [...]

  12. One more game | March 18, 2010 09:20 pm

    [...] 360 slim already under production? Apparently a Xbox 360 slim version might be under works.Source:http://gamingbolt.com/2010/03/17/xbox-360-slim-already-under-production/ Mar [...]

  13. jaice | March 22, 2010 08:03 pm

    well if this is really true than i beliieve that MicroSoft willl fix some of the flaws that already exist with the Xbox360

  14. Latest Xbox 360 chip news – Rumor: XBox 360 Slim Model with Valhalla Chipset Uncovered? – PS3 … | May 01, 2010 02:57 am

    [...] Xbox 360 slim already under production? « GamingBolt.com: Video … [...]

104 queries. 0.542 seconds