The Phenomenal Evolution of Uncharted’s In Game Visuals

Posted By | On 16th, Jan. 2011 Under Feature, Slider | Follow This Author @GamingBoltTweet


Page 1 of 4

Please click the image to see it an pop up and use back – next button to navigate through them.

uncharted-3-in-game-1


uncharted-3-in-game-1

The moment we saw Uncharted 3 announced at last year’s VGA we knew that we had a winner on our hands. Uncharted 3 looks amazing, much better than Uncharted 2 and almost a generation ahead of Drake’s Fortune. But don’t take our word  for it. Check it yourself via the slide show we have prepared for you guys.
And by the way, for those of you who are not aware of the release date, Uncharted 3: Drake’s Deception comes out this November, exclusively on the PlayStation 3.

Next Slide


Awesome Stuff that you might be interested in

  • There’s a big difference between uncharted 1 and 2, but I can’t really see too much difference between 2 and 3…

  • Spot on. There’s nothing “Phenomenal” about the difference between 2 and 3. Indeed, it’s pretty minimal in these shots.

  • pp

    lol who u kidding……..poor ps3 retards uncharted 3 looks the same as uncharted 2 lol…….guess what Gears of War 3 is gonna own uncharted 3 in graphics and in SALES poor poor ps3 owners.

  • The ones with the depth-of-field effect look great!

  • Uncharted 1 shot in 4th pic is far from the release version. The graphics are ugly compared to final game, and his clothes aren’t even the same.

    • jon

      you beat me too it. just for giggles have you also noticed alot of articles about U2 commonly are headlined with a pic from U:DF? at least on n4g.com.

      on page 4 U3 beats U2 but every other screenshot they look about the same, which is pretty impressive for being 10 months from release.

  • I agree that the leap from UC1 to UC2 was massive. I am just not seeing the leap from 2 to 3 though. Maybe it is the fact that all the screens are pretty much in an ugly, dark, burning building, but comparing that to the Nepal levels in UC2 makes it hard to say UC3 is a HUGE leap forward. I haven’t seen ONE aspect of UC3 that looks better than UC2, in fact, after watching some of the gameplay, the physics/death animations actually look worse (although I’m sure that will be worked out before release).

    I’m sure the game will be great, but it really makes you look like a fanboy when you say UC3 looks “much better” than UC2. Care to explain how or why? Is it just the fact that the game has a fire level???? None of the those screens look near as nice as the Nepal level shown in those screens.

  • U2 and U3 shots are cutscenes and bullshots. This article is a phenomenal FAIL.

  • Peter is right, the Uncharted 1 pictures do not do the game justify, they don’t even seem to be from the final build.

    As for what Tarek said, you must be blind or not understand the inner workings of the technology involved in creating a game. If you can’t see the difference between U2 and U3 in that last picture, you need glasses… or eyes.

  • Pingback: World Spinner()

  • Pingback: INFAMOUS 2: Is the Graphical Leap Evolutionary? - GamingBolt.com: Video Game News, Reviews, Previews and Blog()

  • rak33n

    the uncharted series set a foundoution for other games the visuals, story etc. other games should take notes

  • tareq salah

    naughtydog has got to be the most talented studio out there. they improve drastically within a year or two its amazing.


 

Copyright © 2009-2017 GamingBolt.com. All Rights Reserved.